i know i didn't

the game is just to long winded, and most of that time your freaking out because theres no way you can deffend all your teretory and attack at once, which creats some back tracking, the fact that you have to capture almost everyplanet is a total b****
i wish we could make more ships on big maps, i curetnly in the middle of a 10 player ffa with over 250 planets, and i keep losing my planets as i gain them

I don't think this is an adequate response to a legitimate criticism. It is well known and established that sins was released early for commercial reasons, and things such as 'end game sequences' and a single player campaign would have pushed the release back further and hit profit margins, or so say some involved in the development and publishing of sins.

I always think that the longer a game takes to finish, the more spectacular the end sequence needs to be. I remember when I finished UFO: Afterlight (Great fun game) which took hours and hours to finish, and was great fun doing so, ended with a rather dull scene that just reflected that Mars was now terraformed. I was hoping it would also show my allies there with me as well, if I had them.

I believe Retro was responding to Retribution_666's off-topic and over generalized complaining.

TheUnityCalls is correct.

-- Retro

i dont buy or not buy a game depending on the end game screen
that would be retarded

I think it would have been nice to have an image montage with a voice over, like the intro.

How about we stop complaining about end scenes on forums and play sins miltiplayer? Honestly, there aren't enough people playing online. Support the game that your conversing about!   

I would suggest that the original Half-Life had one of the worst endings of all time. Then, if you played Unreal Tournament III, that's got an awful ending as well. Then, I would put Sins. Above that, I would put the ending to Windows Solitaire.

A problem I have with Sins isn't so much the lacklustre ending screen, but the endgame in general. There seems to come a point in mid-game where I know for sure me and/or my allies are going to win or lose. After that point, little seems to affect the outcome of the game. In the games I have played, there is not much tension to the end game. Even in Civilization, if you know you are beaten, you can still hang on and make your mark in the history books. Sins ending to me is more like binary: 1=faultless victory, 0=humble defeat, with little in between.

Of course, your mileage may vary, and I am only speaking of single player game play. Still, Sins is definitely cooling off on my hard drive. At least it wasn't expensive to buy.

Are you serious? I consider it one of the greatest, and I'm sure I'm not the only one.

But I suppose opinions can vary