OMG MOd you think?? I always thought that John had Marilyn done away with... so Bobby got rid of John...because he was in love with her... then they had to get rid of MLK because he knew too much and was going to get someone to write a speech about it for him.This conspiracy of assasinations could be never ending....The biggest 'Who done it' in history.

I doubt that if a rightwing idol were found to have lifted the words of another without giving proper credit, dabe and her fellow hounds would lose one second in loudly and gleefully pointing it out. Yet, you're completely willing to overlook MLK's failings. JFK was addicted to pain pills and sex (very, very often with women other than his wife), and Teddy Kennedy is an alcoholic and is guilty of manslaughter. Yet, once again the Left overlooks these failings in their gods.

First of all, I doubt very much if you can find many left wingers that consider John or Robert heros of theirs.
John almost brought the world to the brink of war over the Cuban Missle Crisis, was blamed for escalating the war in Vietnam, both causes just have happened to be the prime activities of the left in the 6os.
Bobby as Attorney General hounded MLK to his grave. He signed into legeslation laws (The Walter McCarren Act) tht made Joe McCarty look like a liberal... and also acted as defence attorneyy for that bastard during his trial. Botyh are far from heros or Gods of the left.

First of all, I doubt very much if you can find many left wingers that consider John or Robert heros of theirs.

You live in Isreal, correct? Or am I mistaken?
Come to American shores and you'll get a different perspective. The Kennedys are worshipped here as the ideal liberal crusaders, and, as such, are forgiven for any and all faults. Kenndy might have gotten us into Vietnam, but it was Johnson who screwed it all up; Kenndy did hold the line and make Kruschev back down. Many who knew Kruschev at the time have said that he was never willing to actually use nuclear missles and chance destroying the world to defend pissy little Cuba. Still,

I give JFK proper credit here; he didn't know that, and still was willing to stand on principle rather than let it go. Think, say, Clinton would have been that steady and strong, if it had happened during his term? I doubt it.

*"Off topic note to RW, since I can't respond on the other thread about this topic, (some people are just too chicken to let me speak to them directly.)


Don't let the specious argument that whites get more welfare than blacks do over on that other thread throw ya off. Of COURSE we do, but comparitively speaking, a MUCH larger percentage of blacks recieve aid. Remember, they're only like...17% of the population.

I'm sure there are many reasons for that, which needn't be rehashed here, but the claim itself is specious when you look at relative percentages of the populations involved.

Its an old trick, and Im surprised you haven't given it a proper rebuttal over there"*---little whip

Thanks, LW....niggling (oops...was that a racist term?) little details like that often escape my notice.

you might be able to see the indisputable fact that whites collect more welfare money than do members of any other race.

I think you have to look at the percentages of groups in a population and how each group is collecting.For example, where I live we have a small %age of blacks but they are committing a large %age of the crime.

thanks, Mike. I'll check it out now.

great post!!