Had he taken a harder stand and been a Unionist, the Civil War would not have been the drawn-out, bloody conflict it was. |
This is one of those 'what ifs' I see it as weakening the south as they did not do what was needed to gear up for it due to the incompetancy of Pierce and Buchanan. if there had been a stronger leader, we could have had one of 2 scenarios:
1: A dictatorship (of the federals), and so today we would be even more enslaved
2: 2 countries as the South would have started earlier preparations. And held the north to a stand still.
You see, where you see the 2 dead beats as being bad for the union, I see them as a necessary evil. For with stronger presidents, we would have had one of the 2 above abominations.
that does not make either good, just necessary for the Union to Survive. Look at it as the Judas for the US. You cant have a Jesus without a Judas. you cant have a Union without a Pierce (or Buchanan).
Hope that helps to explain my Judas vs Your Judas.