but see.....those are all references to the Old Testament.....the "old covenant". When Jesus came, shed his blood, and died, rose again and ascended to heaven, he made the New Testament...the "new covenant".....
I understand what you are saying. And I agree, there are many ppl that "pick and choose" what to accept from Scripture and what not to accept. But, are you not doing the same thing? In one hand, you say and acknowledge that the bible does say homosexuality is a sin....but then, turn around and say that doesn't matter, God has changed his mind on that.
I challenge you to find in the NT where the Bible says to do as you will, heaven is there for your taking, no matter what you do. It just simply isn't there, no matter how much you try to bring up the OT. Your arguments are weak when I ask you about the NT....I am not talking about the OT.
Once more, with feeling....the OT is a shadow of the NT, and the NT is the fulfillment of the Old....You can't have one without the other....if you read the bible, you would know that the OT law was given so that we would know what sin is.
You have a "cute" argurment here, but it does not stand up to New Testament discussions speaking on the same things. Besides, as another blogger elsewhere has already said, unless you are willing to take the Bible as a whole as the inspired Word of God, these discussions are useless. You are only trying to force Christians to accept what you do and condone it. If you would actually READ what the bible says about sin, you would see that what you are talking about is wrong.