They deserve every bit of criticism they get, and then some!
Actually, they don't.
As much as "fanboys" are lambasted, I'm here to expose unbalanced critics: Elemental is not bad. Elemental is very good and is riddled with problems from the launch, which was bad.
The criticism for that is totally valid, but then we have our typical unbalanced critics, ready to pounce...spouting catch-phrases and two dollar words they learned will get blood boiling because they are sharp spears piercing at gamers lately.
As one person put it in another post: Elemental isn't getting Fs,it's getting Cs and C+s. Stardock does not deserve the criticism belonging to an F-grade company.
Elemental also has massive expansion potential -- the "end" vision of it is still there, undamaged and quite achievable.
As much as fanboys defend blindly, unbalanced critics are worse, and represent a cancer among gamers: they don't want a good game, they don't want to help...they want to get angry and tear down. That is never the right way to go.
Criticize what is to be criticize...extol what is to be extolled. It's as simple as what you want: I want the game Elemental promises to be, and Stardock's record and credibility is such that I KNOW this will happen.
So, unbalanced critics: get over yourselves and your piddling little "outrage." It is ephemeral nonsense...either you want the promise or you don't. If you don't...then why are you here? Certainly the vast majority of the critiques we already know; you add nothing new.
What is the point?
I know what my point is: standing behind a good company, and wanting the game they can and will make and support. That never changed just because an official release date came and went.
Pick what you want and act accordingly; do not take some condescending fake "stand" to feel powerful and in the "right." In the end, Stardock is still a great company, and Elemental is, by reports, a fun game with some heavy flaws...that will be transformed into a fantastic game. Not a thing changes these facts.