Though the exclamation point joke was pretty funny.

Wow. There's a mouthful. I assume because he's been blacklisted, there's not a wealth of his comments remaining for me to check out, is there? Does he direct his remarks toward people for the purpose of disruption, without basing them on any substance?

TBT

Little_Whip is certain further right on the continuum than I am, if not on the opposite end; but she hasn't ever proposed anything that would make me think of her as a white supremacist. Are you, Little_Whip?

TBT

Reply #66 By: David Saint Hubbins (Anonymous) - 11/23/2004 1:20:42 PM Little Whip has confirmed she is a 'former' member of the KKK, see her blog article titled 'Why I joined the KKK'. She claims to be no longer active but she has made many anti-Muslim, anti-Israel, anti-gay, anti black posts, check her blog for such articles as 'Poor, Black, And Filthy'. I can point to several concrete examples in her articles, but the overall tone is racist and incites hatred against racial and religious groups, and I have notfied the ADL. Her husband once wrote an article titled 'The Niggarization of America' which was so vicious he deleted it and he now blogs under an assumed name. This is all true, not exaggerated, and factually accurate. Notice I have made no value judgements or personal attacks above. See what one nasty comment from Dr. Miller led to? That's why I'd appreciate it if people would stop attacking me, because it leads to these sorts of tangents. Kindest Regards, David St. Hubbins *Home of the No-Hate Guarantee!*

What is the ADL? If you are refering to the "American Defence league" Then there is nothing they can do to LW.
If it's only other people attacking you, then why were you banned from the site?

<

I will investigate, and then I will email you, Little Whip.

TBT

Among other mistruths stated above, I've never gleefully agreed with Petey that "Hitler was Right to Gas Gays". That is a lie. See, that's the difference, I don't have to make up LW's racism because her blog is rife with it. The rest is opinion, fantasy, and speculation that should be given the consideration due to a coke addict ex-con convicted hacker online fraud artist self-admitted mentally imbalanced 'former' KKK member who seems to have a hate on for me.

I'd prefer to be engaged in more positive conversation here. I'll stop responding when the lies and personal attacks stop, but I have to wonder if Dharma and LW aren't looking for a little attention; they don't seem happy unless they have an enemy to attack.

Kindest Regards,
David St. Hubbins

"Do I contradict myself? Very well then I contradict myself,
(I am large, I contain multitudes.)" - Whiman

One of my favourite quotes.

LW: 'For someone whose truly interested in 'positive' conversation, i'll remind you that it was YOU who posted a link to one of MY articles here, and started the negative flow, threats, and accusations.'

I did not post a link to one of our articles here, and that fact is plain to see for anyone who scrolls up. I did mention one of your articles as an example of a toxic user, but did not link to it. I did not make any threats; threats are serious business (like the death threat you made against Sir Pete, the quickly asked TW to delete - plenty of JU regs remember that) and I don't do that sort of thing. And it was Dr. Miller who started the negative flow with his not so nice comment, not me.

Again' I'll stop posting when the lies stop. I didn't make any threats, I took great care to not make any personal attacks or value judgements in my comments above; my statements are factually accurate, not accusations. And I've never agreed or felt that 'Hitler was right to gas gays'.

Kindest Regards,
David St. Hubbins

He was banished

To quote my youngest son, "Cool".  Little_Whip, since I previously commented on politicalmachine.com and not Joeuser.com, I never really understood how the point thing worked.  Where can I find information on that?  That's an open question to anyone who's got the answers.

Cheers

As far as I know the context kind of goes something like this:

Many months ago, back when I had just started to read and comment on the blogs on this site, there was a blogger. His name was David Saint Hubbins, and he was an angry, angry man. He wrote curious articles about the deficiencies of the US system, whihc made many of his fellow bloggers, including the admins, a little vexed. Combined with an effortlessly smug and superior attitude Mr Hubbin seemed certain to become one of the first of the famous suicidal jihad bloggers. Other bloggers like Little Whip and Draginol/Frogboy/Brad Wardell the admin responded by making angry, angry comments on his blogs. And Mr Hubbins responded with equally angry, angry comments. Eventually, after weeks of increasingly obnoxious and unhealthy back-and-forth, the admins had enough and David Saint Hubbins was banned. You can still hear his voice in the wind through the power of anonymous comments, haunting the unbanned bloggers he first fought all those months ago.

He never particularly irritated me, because to a large extent I'm just as arrogant and I'm a little programmed to think in an anti-America way, but he did piss off many of the regular Joeusers, who surprisingly enough happen to be Americans and disliked someone who seemingly never had anything positive to say, ever. When I first arrived at JU I thought Little Whip was one of those stereotypical racist, redneck hicks who seem to abound on the internet. But over time you can see from her articles that that's not the whole picture, and it's a pretty bastardised picture at that. Perhaps there was more to Mr Hubbins than anger and arrogance, but I don't recall ever seeing it.

That's my take on the whole deal anyway, but it's probably better if you just ignore the whole thing and let the past stay where it is. It's up to you whether you want to let anonymous users post on your blog or whether you want Mr Hubbins to either. But all the long-time regulars here have a reputation and they're not always deserved. From what you've written here and elsewhere in your articles I don't think you'd be the sort of person to judge by the words of others so I'll let you get back to it.