Wow, here are two examples of people who have chosen polar opposites, have become incredibly sarcastic, and fail to recognize that both posts are repugnant to a third party.

 

Cheers

Pfft. Third parties are wasted votes.

The person who wrote that did not vote for a third party, fyi.

We know the crimes against humanity and the country committed by Bush

What crime are you talking about? If you are refering to the Iraq invarsion, keep one fact straight. We kill more Iraqis during Clinton adminstration (due to oil sanction) than the Iraqi invarsion. 5000+ children under 5 died every MONTH because of the oil sanction -- even the Clinton adminstration admit this number. That is only for children.

There is a reason why most Iraqis actually want Bush to be reelected. If Bush is so horrible to Iraqis, can you explain why most Iraqis prefer Bush and not Kerry.

What?! But third party candidates are the only ones worth voting for. Voting for one of the two corrupt big parties is just ignorant. It's a shame he doesn't feel the same compassion as I do. I feel saddened that he has made such an error of judgment. Now, is it that he doesn’t care about the issues of other people, or is it he doesn’t know what’s going on in the rest of the world and in our own country to people of other cultures? Maybe both? Maybe neither? Either way, I just don’t understand it.

- America's Savior

Sandy, I am mourning too....I am also terrified with what is going to happen during these next four years. I feel bad for who gets elected in '08 and has to clean up the mess of this campaign....

If Sadam was not a threat today, he would have been. Even Kerry said he was dangerous.

And what about all of the acts of violence he and his family committed?

Doesn't America stand up for the little guy?

Sandy, as long as you take this ignorant and condescending view of your fellow citizens, your candidates will never be elected.  For you cannot run a campaign on lies, like this blog.  The simple fact of the matter is you are just angry, mad, upset and ignorant.  Yet instead of educating yourself, you slam those who have!  As ignorant!  And you slam those the do not agree with you as hopelessly myopic!

You are the reason Kerry lost!  your condesending attitude to all that do not agree with you does not win converts. it does win enemies.  You should read Brad's log on this very issue!

If kerry had won, instead of extending an olive branch to the people who supported Bush, you would be trashing them for being so stupid!  And in your supreme arrogance and ignorance, you would not be winning or converting any one.

I feel sorry for you. For the generic liberal that acts like you I have only contempt.  But you have the option of reading others thoughts, and yet you deny that option.  And that is sad and pathetic.

I hope you can live with your self over the next 4 years.  And maybe learn.  Where there is life, their is hope for learning.  But that is only hope and not a guarantee!

Hell, yeah, you tell them sandy. Keep right on thinking that. Your attitude is why Kerry lost, so maybe if it is perpetutated we'll win again in 2008. To be honest, though, if you think bumpkins and the wealthy make up 51% of the population you're nuts.

I live in a middle class suburban area and it went almost completely for Bush. If you look at the vote in a lot of states, your model simply doesn't hold up, not even close. To pretend that educated people don't vote Republican is the ultimate in self-medication.

Go ahead though, chalk it up to rednecks and oil magnets, and insult Bush voters as fervently and as often as possible. Every time you make a post like this, and the numerous ones you made pre-election, you alienate and drive away more and more people from your snotty Democratic party and hyper-motivate Republicans that wouldn't otherwise vote.

Whatever it takes to make you feel better is fine. This, though, has an added benefit for Republicans. More power to ya...

Your analysis of the polls is..well totally wrong.

While academics tend to vote for Kerry, those who graduate with a bachelors degree tend to vote for Bush.

And most suburbans voted for Bush. See my exit polling blog: http://draginol.joeuser.com/index.asp?AID=33680

 

While academics tend to vote for Kerry, those who graduate with a bachelors degree tend to vote for Bush.

And of course you have to look at geographical trends too, an academic and a bachelor degree holding individual in, say Oregon are more likely to vote for Kerry than those same two people in Texas.

I actually always have sources for everything I say, though I sometimes misread sources, not this time. You should know for sure before personally attacking you. I did not attack you, why are you attacking me. http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1338749,00.html

The record of George W is such that he did not deserve another term as President. The job loss, energy costs and our lack of a intelligent energy policy, no action to solve the funding issues of Social Security and Medicare, the lack of funding for some areas of Homeland Defense and education and the deficit that will come back to haunt America with much higher interest expense as far out as the eye can see. Add the way America is looked by the world and the Iraq war and Bush is the worst president in my 63 years. I am a moderate Republican that is ashamed at what my party has done to our nation. I fear we are in for four more of the same.