I don't write enough for three articles on one subject, and until I have more free time I won't be able to queue up multiple articles of one subject that aren't too assimilated.

Spam: Yes, it may have been multiple bots, but I've banned at least four accounts, and the other admin's much better than me.
Bible: Historically proven. Incredibly historically proven, and never contradicted. It's the world's best ancient history book. It even provides census numbers. Internal consistency would probably mean that it never contradicts itself. That's not anything I'm using to judge it.
Internet (Speed): I'm talking Filefront, huge speeds always. It never has any problems.
Internet (Reliability): It's been good for a few months. I know all about the router/modem crap, it's not the problem. I count that as my own bad, not the internet company. I'm still angry about it, though. It took way too long to get it fixed last time when I had a project I was working on online. Major crapstorm. 

Cox? Do they do throttling?

The Bible has not, and cannot be disproven. It is not fictional, either. It records events otherwise lost to man, that wouldn't add any depth to anyone any more.

Yes, it's 100% accurate in prediction and history.

Except for the few prophecies that have not come true yet. And they're decreasing. I know of some I can prove happened.

BitTorrent works fine for me.

Evolution is a statement of faith.

And? Your subjective interpretations weigh in everything you say. There is nothing subjective about my interpretations, because I read before I heard others' opinions.

No, it is an induction from observed phenomenon.

What observed phenomenon? How many? How thoroughly?

While I do not deny making subjective observations of things, I couldn't say I like ice cream otherwise. I very rarely (if ever) put such things forth as though they are objective fact. If you could please show me an example...

At times I am almost objective to a fault.

One can never be too objective. However, everything you say is subjective, with your spin and wording providing your opinions.

You remind of this guy I encountered over on the amazon forums about a year ago. He believed he had discovered some sort of divine code to the bible...he was convinced the end of the world was going to begin in June or July...of last year.

He's a nutjob. If we knew when God was returning, he would be lying, for He said that He would return when He was not expected.

Read what? Reading something does not make you objective, and not hearing others opinions does not mean you will not have preconceived notions.

I read the Bible alone, by myself, before ever actually hearing it explained. That's why I have so alternative interpretations of it, because I read it without taking too much information about it and its common interpretations in. Also, I read more out of ennui than expectation, so my own "preconceived notions" are very unlikely weighing into my interpretations.

1. But hereditary requires a source, beneficial mutation is too rare to cause separate species.
2. It is unhealthy to be detached? Indecision? What's indecision?
3. You're refusing to read the words.
4. I've considered that, but, then, you aren't seriously expecting Him, then.
5. I read it at church, sure, but I didn't really hear anything about it. I read Tolkein (LoTR, not Hobbit) by 2nd grade, so it's not that surprising, isn't it? I really started reading before I got beyond the David and Goliath collection of stories. And I read the Law more than the stories, it's what interested me more.
6. I don't have admin privileges on this Mac. I'm gonna try a live-disk on an eMac. Any warnings? Also, the go boom was actually just a result of JoeUser hiding the new comment from me.
7. Because I don't make predictions not laid in stone, letter by letter.

1. No, but it seems unlikely that hereditary changes would have any effect on evolution.
2. Yes, but wouldn't the entire community evolve together?
3. Naah.
4. I'm opinionated enough.
5. My point exactly.
6. Ah, but take it down to the nanosecond, and there'll be a gap somewhere. I don't know when He will return, and for real believers, does it really matter.
7. Yes, I did read it alone by myself in church with no explanations. I read the Law in Children's Church. How many people wanna explain the books of the Law to second graders? Also, because I was too busy reading, I paid no attention to anything going on.
8. Lucky, lucky, lucky you.
9. Clarify your point here.

1. What I was talking about is that hereditary traits do not change a species.
2. True that.
3. My thoughts exactly. I think I was talking about detatchment, there.
4. You are, trust me.
5. Your words prove your subjectivity. If you don't wanna be subjective, join the government's writing classes.
6. Definitely. Though I doubt anyone sincerely believes He will return at any given time unless they're a fanatic.
7. Yep, but it's their brainlessness.
8. Yes, it sounds ridiculous, but it's true, which is stranger than fiction. I read OT first, then NT, so I learned law before learning most of the stories.
9. I hate Macs. Overpriced pieces of crap.
10. Ah, but I hate predictions amiable to subjective interpretation. There are so many Jesus prophesies that I can feel safe following Him.

1. Hereditary=passed from parents. Which would mean no-change.
2. I'm a micro-evolutionist believer, macro-evolution remains beyond my grasp, though.
3. It's always possible for someone to be too attatched.
4. No, trust me, you are.
5. No, you speak your opinions, whether or not you are.
6. I mean any given point in time, there's no evidence.
8. My mother is Christian, my father is not. I was kind of in the "cheese!" style of church, but I read the Bible for theology. It's gotten better with age, by the way.
9. Nah, they cost too much. 5.5K OS-flexible, 16K Mac. Are you building these things for the preformance? That's from this year.
10. I've never heard of a prophecy being repeated. Never. There's too many factors in most of them. For instance, the Bible predicted Alexander the Great's destruction of the Persians.