Damn right, it's good to see he is in the same boat a William J. Clinton, and we should hold them both accountable for that, oh wait we didn't on Bill Clinton, in fact we elected him two times, and just glared over that fact, hell we even gave him the credit for the Dot Com Bubble Economy, until it burst, but heck we still said he did a good job, but was handing over a lemon car to either Gore or Bush it didn't matter who, he got elected his second term so he didn't care what could they do to him. But hey we are supposed to not elect a man who was at least in the United States and National Guard, even if the service was questionable, and yet we elected a man who ran off to Canada, while his colleague went to war.
Still would like to know which is the lesser of two evils, a man who was National Guard and who service is questionable, or a man who served and came back, and with knowing better on what went on in Vietnam, lied to the United States Senate, condemning many US POWs and other returning Vietnam Vets to a world of hate, hmm, I wonder which is worse, hmmmm.
I want Bush to answer all the questions about his U.S. Service, telling us what happened in his years of the National Guard.
I want Kerry to answer and apologize to Vietnam Veterans on his going on the record to Defame and Slander Vietnam Veterans by saying they committed atrocities (good luck trying to find Kerry's book at MSRP).
If Bush comes out and answers than he has proven himself.
If Kerry comes out and answers than he has proven himself.
But both have yet to answer their thirty year old actions, proving that they are worthy candidates.
