Yeah, gotta love the American "justice" system. In any reasonable system, she'd be hanged, ideally withing 48 hours of the offense.
Interestingly enough, her defense is that she was too drunk at the time to put the baby in the microwave, so it must have been someone else. Oddly enough she wasn't drunk enough to take the baby to the hospital. The defense is not contesting that the baby was in the microwave, which is odd.
While people can argue parents are a cause, one thing not taken into account (I'm gonna guess it more due to our collective ubringing) is are there parents? Biologically yes, But I'd be willing to bet that China Arnold's baby was unintentional. There is no father figure. I'd even go a step further and say the same of her.
I live in this city and I can say that children born into this are/class of society don't really have parents. Many kids are fatherless ("Oh he's my baby's daddy, but he got other kids and is locked up for 5 years") in the strictess sense of the word. The most they might see of a father figure is various "boyfriends" who most likely don't have the child's intrest at heart and the child grows up in a poor, abusive environment (I've seen examples where kids were forced to live in cupboards and closets). Many of these parents don't have education (got preggers dropped out, got into crime), they don't have jobs (gov't hand outs, social security, gov't housing, etc), and probably are exposed or involved in drugs.
You all have good points. Society as a whole does de-emphasize the family.
On the subject of killing off all the dumb people, who would clean the streets, take out the garbage, etc, if we did that? They serve their purpose to society...Not that every garbage man is dumb, by any means...People come from different backgrounds of opportunity, etc.
The sad part is, on average, the poorer folks have many more children. People who don't go to college tend to have more children than those who do, etc. Over time, what will this trend do to the gene pool?
I'm confused, where is the Poor Gene? IIRC, Social Darwinism was/is a joke. For someone in an academic setting, I'm sure you know that. The Richer have fewer chilren as a child is more of a nuisance or a chore (need babysitters, nannies, tutoring, etc) It distracts and drains the parents from their true desires, career and social status. In some families the childs is more of an addon to the social status (Don't want to be that weird childless couple at the cocktail party no do you?) I think most of you can relate to this as I"m guessing that most of you hail from middle or higher classes ($50K on up). Mommy and Daddy Push you to go to college, say you wouldn't "Have the oppurtunities" if you didn't? Make sure it a marketable major too! Of course having a son/daughter that is a short order cook or garbage man just isn't as good sounding as "attending college" or "Working for a business firm, or engineering dept"
For us, dumb poor people, I don't really care if I make Partner at "the firm" or if I have the fanciest Jag. As a Working Joe, family and friends are very important cause that's all we have.