Wait till they tax your internet access; to fight kiddie porn or some other idea. |
Too late, they already do in this state. Taxes on anything and everything they can. Maybe not directly on hi-speed internet, but on telephone services with labels of 'universal access fee' and similar that are supposed to fund internet for poor people.
Honestly, sin taxes suck FOR THE SINNERS. It is a fact of life that people that consume alcohol and tobacco products pay taxes for those vices. I feel for those people for about 2 seconds and then I think about the negative impacts of the consumption of those products and don't feel so sorry any more.
Liver problems, DUI, domestic violence and a bunch of other problems are traceable to alcohol consumption. Raise the taxes and make the products more expensive for the users and you may cut the consumption of same. If you don't (cut consumption), at least you are raising more money to pay for other important needs.
Do the politicians make stupid decisions on what to do with the money? Hell yes. But quite honestly I'd rather that the Bud drinkers pay more for their products than myself and a bunch of others have to pay 1% more in state sales taxes (which, whether I like it or not is probably coming too). Same with cigarette smokers. If they pay $1 more per pack in taxes and it keeps myself and a bunch of others from having to pay 10% for our state sales taxes.
Pointing back a Loca again - what are *you* going to tell the low income workers that will be asked to pay higher state sales taxes if the state doesn't raise these sin taxes?? If the state sales taxes and state income taxes are doubled (which is a possibility, as in the taxes could be raised from 5% to 10% at cash registers, and state income taxes may also be raised in obscene percentages, though the Governor is promising -- yeah, right, I believe that crap -- that he wants to make the taxes progressive and cut the burden on regular Joes while significantly increasing it on those that the state labels as 'well to do') then who gets hit the hardest???
You cry a river about injustices done in the Bush administration, and how the Bush tax cuts sucked and helped the wealthy, and yet you slam me for pointing at consumption taxes and suggesting that they are a good thing because they can and do help curb that consumption, can and will help improve the health of citizens of the state (because some people will quit smoking/drinking, or at least not do it as much and because the state will take a good size chunk of the money raised and spend it on health care for it's citizens).
Yet more examples of liberal hypocrisy. And hmm, don't I recall a recent exchange between us where I had left a comment on one of your articles pointing out your own hypocrisy before?