Racism will always exist,
I'm not willing to accept this, and I think that overcoming it is our great hope. If we can learn to see each other as individuals it becomes harder to make decisions that result in other's deaths. I truly believe that we are seeing some of this today. The information we get on a daily basis about Iraq is making it hard for the American public to accept staying there, and rightly so. We can see that our actions are causing harm, and we wish to end that. I think that is an enlightened view, and morally correct. The problem with that is that can be viewed as weakness. Weakness can open the door to another 9/11 style terror attack. So, possibly, by trying to do the right thing we invite our own destruction.
humans certainly aren't reaching their full potential fighting eachother.
Here is a thought that will spark some debate...
What if this is a form of social Darwinism, a way that we evolve? Just as the strongest animals reproduce more, thus strengthening the species, this could be a way that we test the relative strength of our cultures. Not conciously, but in a way that we are driven to.
Think about this - the religious fanatacism we see as the Muslim sects tear each other apart are very similar to Europe in the 16th & 17th centuries. Europeans got over that (read: evolved) in the 18th century. Not perfectly, but it got better. It is still getting better. So, Iraq is a couple of centuries behind us.
This does not mean good or bad. It is just a measure of creation of wealth, of the ability of each individual to achieve his/her potential, and other things. But by any measurable standard that I can think of (I could be wrong - it's late and I'm getting tired) we are a superior culture. The fact that individual citizens in the Islamic world are attracted to our way of life could be a sign of this. Left unchecked they would Westernize. Only their governments can hold them back.
Does this mean we are better or "good", in a moral sense? No, I'm not saying that. Nor was Cro-Magnon man "better" Neanderthal man. But, eventually, one evolved more than the other and won the Darwinian contest. The same thing could be true, here.
I expect that you will all have differing opinions, Marcus in particular, but maybe Stormbringer will have my back. Comments?