Yes, that's a big part right there. And I do think my being the mom of boys and Gid, you the dad of girls makes a difference in the way you look at this scenerio. At 22 I was married with one baby and another on the way. This girl here is in no danger and is not planning to live with her boyfriend, so that's not a parental concern. |
I'll respond to this one first. Do you know how many times girls have moved away not planning on moving in with their boyfriends, only to have a bad roommate experience lead them to decide to move in? I can't count the number of times I have seen this scenario play out in one way or another. Not to say that would happen here, but it's more likely to occur when the individual is outside the scope of parental influence.
I find it odd, KFC, that some of the rules you encourage others to follow are rules you are more than willing to waive for those close to you. This isn't the first time I have seen this.
I'm sure the girl is in no danger, but I'm also sure the parents have her best interests at heart. Wouldn't it have been better to encourage the girl to continue to work with her parents and communicate with them more to prepare for the move? When does the commandment to "honor your father and mother" become null and void? And can a relationship founded on rebellion truly thrive and prosper without a great deal of difficulty? I really think these concerns should have factored into your advice to this girl. Yes, she is 22, not 18, but encouraging a spirit of rebellion will only foster that spirit of rebellion in her relationship with her boyfriend. This could lead to some relationship problems down the road.
Would you allow your 18 yr old daughter go to Austin for college? If so, why not a 22 year old to locate there regardless if a boy is involved or not. Quite often these girls find their future husbands in college and when they do they spend every moment out of class with them and meet them there year after year. What's the difference? |
If she is going there for college, she's going there to prepare for a future. She is not "putting all her eggs in one basket" as this girl is; if the relationship fails, the girl is stuck in a strange city 400 miles from her extended family.
I personally agree the family made an unwise decision in this, because they made it far less likely that she will return to them for advice if problems come up. Better to accept her decisions as an adult without approving of them, and let her know the door is always open.
From my angle knowing most of the pieces of this puzzle, I see control and a relunctance on the part of the parent's in letting go. It's not the first time I've seen this. It is quite common especially in these modern times. |
I won't disagree about the control and reluctance. But how would you feel, KFC, if the parents of one of your boys' girlfriends was encouraging your son to rebel against you and your husband's authority? Would you feel they were acting biblically?
As for your comment "it is quite common especially in these modern times", KFC, I would argue it is not common ENOUGH. In our culture we too often feel like breaking away from the nest means we must abandon the wisdom of our parents and make our own way, and make all our mistakes all over. One of the advantages we have as humans is that we live long enough to impart our wisdom to future generations.
You speak as if this was a modern problem, KFC, it is not. 150 years ago, the idea of an unmarried woman moving 400 miles away from her family to be with the man she intended to marry would have been unthinkable unless she had a relative she could stay with, who could advise her and offer her a home. If anything, the parents' reluctance is more of a TRADITIONAL mindset than it is a MODERN mindset.
I know you love your children, KFC, and I know you love this young lady as well. It is obvious in your writing. But I think you should step outside of the equation for a while and ask yourself if the advice you are giving this young lady is honestly the advice you would give another couple in similar situations. I am sure your boys are decent, honorable men, KFC, but let's not forget that they are young, and are prone to making some less than wise choices. None of them are in any way above temptation. Your advice might be better received if it was at all considerate of the feelings of the parents of this girl, who, although they are not making the decisions I would make, clearly want the best for their daughter, just as you want the best for your sons.