This from Wonkette:
"We have it on semi-reliable authority that the Bush administration's next attempt to discount Richard Clarke's credibility will consist of alleging that he's a big gay."
Apparently the Bush administration doesn't have great intelligence, but it does have a time machine that can transport us back to 1972 when a sane person might still have considered this a "credibility" issue.
Now, some wacko southerners (or northerners or westerners or mid-westerners) might still think that this is a knock on Clarke's reliability, but they're wackos. They are already voting Republican .
Really I think this'll just make the Bush administration seem desperate. Like that girl at high school parties; the one who keeps telling you how drunk she is.
On the other hand, if Clarke is gay, it turns out that that federal anti-gay marriage amendment was a really bad idea.
Let me get this straight: You have from a "source" that Bush might do X in the future but you're going to condemn him on it now even though there's no evidence of this?
I have it on a VERY factual source that Kerry zealots are going to start claiming that Bush is planning to bash Clarke by saying he's gay.
lol. Re-read what you wrote, ian. You made it quite clear that you believed this to be a fact. There is no "IF this were true..." instead you wrote:
You condemned before the crime was even commited based on "a semi-reliable source" that this might be done.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
Sign in or Create Account
