heh, a lot of the same thing over and over. I've known many people in my life that smoked pot, and no not
all of them acted like Cheech and Chong, but I never knew anyone that wanted to smoke pot without getting high from it. I mean it is a silly argument, really. The equivalent of "Oh, yeah, we want to legalize pot, but we don't want to get
that high or anything, just a little..."
Bakerstreet, what's the big deal if a product makes someone intoxicated? Why do you object to occasional intoxication so much? I know people who get drunk every weekend. |
Intoxication is frowned upon universally, you overlook that? You can't be trying to say that one beer = one joint in the level of intoxication. You just take a puff and stubb it out? I think it is kind of telling that these conversations imply that everyone who drinks alcohol gets a buzz. Do you know how many billions of gallons are consumed of beer and wine worldwide? Intoxication is the aberation, the abuse of the substance. With MJ, even if you just want a 'little', it is the point.
Once again, back to the 'Democracy" thing. People don't want pot to be legal, period. We've had 50 years of this diatribe blown in our face, and guess what, we still don't want it legal. Make all the hemp will save the world rants you want, but in 50 years no one has been able to show enough proof of insipid arguments like " it is a renewable energy source that could almost instantly end our need for Arab oil" to make it palatable to legalize.

, gah.
Come on. You rant against stereotypes and then you preach them. You act shocked that 'stoners' exist and pretend that the average person who smokes pot barely gets a buzz and is really wanting it legalized so they can save the earth with hemp. Just as stereotypical and dated as your 'dead head' analogy.
In the end, with all the ranting, the point isn't getting being accepted. If you can't make a decent point in 50 years, then maybe it isn't the world that is deluded.