Thanks for the feedback. The reason I had originally questioned whether this was a mistake was section 1.b. of the EULA which reads:
An Individual User may: Install the Software on another computer if the installation will not exceed the individual user activation limit of one computer set forth above.
I was originally confused by this section because I felt that it was strange to explicitly grant a user right to install the software on another computer so long as the total number of computers does not exceed one. I was puzzled by how I as a user could leverage this use right. But after long reflection I recognize the legal genius of this particular statement and respect Stardock all the more for it.