It's been commented on before. He doesn't really give an opinion, he just reads each side's claims.
Yes, this. I was really bored with those videos because he just read documents I could've read for an hour or two and doesn't even postulate an opinion, which I thought was the whole purpose of his videos.
That's the entire point... he doesn't give an opinion. What people who understand this are trying to hammer into others with no luck is that opinions mean nothing.
He goes over the documents submitted and explains what they mean in layman's terms so that we understand what the law jargon actually means.
As I said, which seems to be ignored here, is that our opinions don't matter till the evidence gets weighed in court.
What makes me actually annoyed, is that you complain about a video explaining the documents while admitting you've 'not' read them yourself. Why are you even part of this discussion when all you have to add is that you found an useful explanation (for this topic) boring?