I have my differences (as you know) with the Libertarian Party, but I have often voted Libertarian at the local level. Strengthening the influence from "third parties" is a lot more important than the details of either of the parties themselves. |
Yeah, I'm not 100% in line with the Libertarian platform, either...just 100% in line with the IDEALS of the party. As our state executive director notes, Libertarians don't agree on anything except the fundamental right of adult citizens to make certain decisions for themselves. But I see the LP as being closer to my ideological stance than any other party in this imperfect world.
Just remember: Jesse Ventura beat the 'big two' too! |
The wind's actually right for indies and third party candidates. The current Lt. Governor (Republican) is running as an independent against the incumbent governor, increasing the chance that more Republicans will vote for individual candidates and not straight party, and Kinky Freidman's infamous campaign (headed, incidentally, by Ventura's old campaign manager) increases the chance that more Dems will vote for individual candidates. The school finance reform fiasco (TX residents will know what I'm talking about) and the Trans Texas Corridor proposal have a lot of citizens here fed up with incumbents. The question is, can I translate that disgust into votes.
And my opponent was co-author of our anti-gay marriage amendment. Don't know how that will affect the campaign in the long run, but it does give me some built in votes.