There is a MAJOR difference between saying "I NEVER said that, show me otherwise!" and saying "
Congratulations! You are now officially King Of All Liars! " This is a direct quote from you.
I was lumping you in with all the rest of the left and "most" of them are calling for Rove/Libby's head. So for that, I'm sorry. That being said you "still" don't come to a persons blog and say what you said with impunity! It's part of the freedom of choice. You are free to do what you want, when you want and how you want. But on the other hand you "must" be willing to pay the consequences. You also should pay some attention to who's writing what.
Libby wasn't indicted for "outing" this CIA employee (not covert).
It appears that you truly do not have a good grasp on the english language. I did not say anywhere that Libby was indicted for outing anyone. I said he is alleged to have exposed a CIA employee. I did not say she was covert, nor did I say he was indicted for that. There is a lot of evidence that he identified a CIA employee to reporter(s) that they did not previously know to be a CIA employee. Whether or not that's a crime is not the point I was making.
You say Libby did something so heinious that he deserves to be in jail.
Congratulations! You are now officially King Of All Liars! Show me where I said that Libby deserves to be in jail.
Why are you so hostile towards truth and honesty?
You don't have any idea what document(s) Berger took. Yes, they were classified...he's admitted that, but you can't make an honest case that shredding documents is as "heinous" (your word, not mine) as giving classified information to reporters. He may not have violated the law in question regarding outing a covert operative, but he most certainly gave them information that was classified. |
This was directed to me. However the" indicted for outing" statement was NOT mine. It was "Island Dog".
