Forum Home | Login

terpfan1980

Join Date 08/2004

+13

The chase to find "leakers" and it's chilling effect on MSM

The following article underscores a huge unintended consequence of the hunt for the Valerie Plame leaker. Comments follow article snippet. Headline is linked. (From New York Times)

Newspaper Withholding Two Articles After Jailing

By ROBERT D. McFADDEN
Published: July 9, 2005

The editor of The Cleveland Plain Dealer said last night that the newspaper, acting on the advice of its lawyers, was withholding publication of two major investigative articles because they were based on illegally leaked documents and could lead to penalties against the paper and the jailing of reporters.
The editor, Doug Clifton, said lawyers for The Plain Dealer had concluded that the newspaper, Ohio's largest daily, would probably be found culpable if the authorities were to investigate the leaks and that reporters might be forced to identify confidential sources to a grand jury or go to jail.
"Basically, we have come by material leaked to us that would be problematical for the person who leaked it," Mr. Clifton said in a telephone interview. "The material was under seal or something along those lines."
In an earlier interview with the trade journal Editor & Publisher, which published an article on its Web site late yesterday, Mr. Clifton said that lawyers for The Plain Dealer and its owner, Newhouse Newspapers, had strongly recommended against publication of the articles.
"They've said, This is a super, super high-risk endeavor and you would, you know, you'd lose," Mr. Clifton told Editor & Publisher. "The reporters say, 'Well, we're willing to go to jail,' and I'm willing to go to jail if it gets laid on me, but the newspaper isn't willing to go to jail."

... more at linked article

So we start to see the chilling effect that the "hunt for Karl Rove", ooops, I mean the hunt for the leaker in the Valerie Plame case has on the press in this country.

Look, I'm no huge fan of the "MSM" (Main Stream Media). Read through past articles and comments in others postings and you could figure that out (though I'm known to clip from articles in order to add comments on current events, politics and other issues -- mainly to help prove a point or provide background on the issues I want to comment on).

With that said, we see from the article above just what we wind up with if we start and/or continue down the witch hunt path in an effort to "find leakers."

Please don't read me wrong -- whoever leaked the information about Valerie Plame should be found and punished, and I remain someone that hates having government employees and others take the "whistleblower" tact. If you have a problem with something that is going on, it should be resolved via official channels. If that truly doesn't work, then perhaps it is necessary to go the whistleblower or leaker route, but in many, many cases the leaker/whistleblower goes running to the press before ever considering going to an "internal affairs" or "inspector general" type group that is available to them. Rather than waiting for things to be addressed internally, people want immediate satisfaction, and immediate change, so they tattle to the press, who then has to go put together a story via multiple credible sources.

There have been times when news organizations get it badly wrong -- for example, the New York Times, CBS News and others in their attempts to tar and feather George W. Bush on the National Guard issue and others.

But what happens if there is an issue of national importance, or extreme local importance and a news outlet gets the information on wrong doing or corruption that affects the issue? If the issue is vitally important, should the news outlet sit on the story for fear that they can't protect their sources thanks to the decisions that are letting the New York Times reporters in the Plame case sit rotting in jail?

It could be happening in the case in the article above, and yet worries about protecting the news outlet from the reach of the judiciary have come in to stop the Cleveland Plain Dealer from publishing their article.

Yup, don't you just love a free press?

politics

Locked Post

Advanced Search

Watch this post

Do not email me updates for this post Email me updates for this post

Successfully updated karma reason!

Look, if the press is participating in illegal acts, such as publishing classified information, then they must face the consequences. We don't have a special law set aside for the media. If they believe that the information they are publishing is worth going to jail for, I can respect that. If they decide that breaking the law isn't worth it in this case, I can respect that, too.

What I cannot respect is, reporters publishing illegal information obtained from criminals, and then refusing to reveal the identity of the criminals they got the illegal info from.

Successfully updated karma reason!

It's really interesting at first and now a little boring political show in Washington DC. The "leak" of CIA agent identity information and the sentence to the writer maybe rooted in the same neo-conservationalsim group but may conflict each other. On the other side, the main critics of new conservationists also conflict each other.

The leak of the CIA agent id information just after Mrs. Agent reveal that Bush administration use the wrong information to justify the launch of IRAQ war. Of course Mr. X-Rove, sorry, I mean Mr. X-leaker took newspaper as kind of weapon to punish those independent Mrs. Agent. And the now if people want to prove that Mr. Leaker is wrong, they have to face the kind of fact: we have to define a certain clear border the democracy and so that we can defend justice in a post cold war world, and prevent democracy from the threat of highly professioned politician, just like Mr. X-leaker.

That would the be the core of the whole story.

Successfully updated karma reason!

Actually I'm proud of the Plain Dealer and even sent them an Email to that affect. I think it's refreshing the a news outlet is actually showing more interest in getting all the information and making sure they can back up their story through legal means before riding into a story roughshod, merely to get "the scoop".

I don't think this is a backlash over the Valarie Plame fiasco as a move towards a little more caution and integrity in the wake of a destroyed reputation from some of the most reputable news outlets in our country.

Bravo Cleveland Plain Dealer!!!!

Successfully updated karma reason!

Island Dog

Join Date 06/2003

+1048

The leak of the CIA agent id information just after Mrs. Agent reveal that Bush administration use the wrong information to justify the launch of IRAQ war. Of course Mr. X-Rove, sorry, I mean Mr. X-leaker took newspaper as kind of weapon to punish those independent Mrs. Agent.

All of that is just false. The "information" that revealed nothing has already been debunked.

As usual, you have already convicted Rove with no proof or evidence.

Successfully updated karma reason!

The leak of the CIA agent id information just after Mrs. Agent

More BS!! Plame admitted to Time magazine that she was NOT AN AGENT! That she was merely a "analyst". Get your facts straight. And btw.....even if Rove "is" the leak. Since Plame is/was nothing more than an office worker (self-proclaimed) then "whoever" did it did NOTHING illegal!

Successfully updated karma reason!

kingbee

Join Date 04/2004

+42

What I cannot respect is, reporters publishing illegal information obtained from criminals, and then refusing to reveal the identity of the criminals they got the illegal info from

that is the exact case in this situation. the person being protected is not an employee frustrated by administrative malfeasance or criminal behavior...he or she broke at least one law and may currently be violating additional laws against conspiracy, interfering with an investigation and perjury.

lawyers don't have a shield to hide behind if they are privy to information about crimes in progress or crimes that are about to occur.

the reporter is abusing her privilege.

Successfully updated karma reason!

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.

There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting and posting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!

View all recent posts

Mark all posts as read Delete cookies created by the forum Return to Top

Stardock Forums v Server Load Time: Page Render Time: