Jill Useer: I observe Bush, SR. went from most popular in rating under 'approval' rating to a loss to Clinton. This was a extraordinary achievement for any sitting President. I read that in his 12 years in the Executive branch, he appropriated control of some 500 Billion to his control. Brad may say what the literal figure, and this is a stopping point for such people, as any controlled information follower will never get to the bottom of what motivates men such as Bush to deliberately lose such an office.
I have no problem with being called a conspiracy researcher, as the term once was applied to JFK conspiracy whackos who dared to say JFK was murdered in a conspiracy. In 1963 they were whacko, today over 83% of all Americans believe there was a conspiracy. Granted that I have many scenarios I hypothesize on, but this is the very nature of the intelligence agencies of any government. We constantly ask, "What if...?"
Granted, such speculative reasoning is prone to wrong conclusions and thus we see so many conspiracy theses debunked. I find one can wend one's way through it all by learning to separate the sh-- form the candy. Few intellectual pursuits are as enjoyable or rewarding as conspiracy research. On occassion one finds the pulse of a plot and can develop it enough to be an expose. Some go for the money by honest research, while others use emotional rant of reptoids who sleep with them and tell secrets with the smoke in bed afterwards.
It's as if we are constant novel writers hatching new scenarios and presenting viable options as here. (Capt775 makes this observation)We are idea people and not afraid to think and read outside and inside the lines.
Here I put forth a scenario. It may be true, it may not. By putting it up, it can lead another to make a connection he/she did not think of before reading it. We feed each other's ideas. Part of the hazard of such work is the creation of reptoids smoking in bed, but some also leads to a address book of a witness who has a friend named 'Poppy' Bush, when he suppossedly shot himself in the back of the head with a full-length shotgun, the day he was to give testimony on the JFk assassination. New connections are made which no one researcher had a complete picture of. Eventually we get to a workable thesis which shows its' acceptance or rejection by the critical review of peers and other authorities.
For example I once read Webster Tarpleys book on Bush and took a minute to send my observations on Don Arronow, whose book mentioning Bush,Sr. was removed from public sale until after his election in 1988. We ask, WHY? and get a copy (in my town, the public library copy was dog-eared from mafia-types reading it to make sure their name was not in it). Once we read it it adds to the overall picture of who Bush, Sr. is and if nothing else we learn of his propensity for fast cigar boats. We also learned of his sale to the coast guard of a fleet of such boats made by his friend, which were defective and caused the engine to become a shrapnel bomb once it topped 50M.P.H. Hmmm. We learn he was the first to ever buy boats from a private maker such as Aronow. We see his gulf coast oil rigs, purchase of such boats, locations of drug drops and dates, those dates and Arronows brother dying in Central America for drug debts, calls to the white house and Bush. Eventually a new and clearer picture of Bush, Sr. develops that becomes workable. All from one e-mail on a obscure book, looked up after reading a blip in the news. All because we ask the question. Why?
One more for you: The relationship with Bush, Sr and Jr. and the bin Laden family is extensive and well-known. A Salem bin Ladin[sic depending on American or Saudi spelling] was actually killed in a plane crash (one of them again) in Texas after meeting with his oil investment Company officer, Bush. Fact, go check news records for spring 1982[?]. Bin Laden's were meeting with Bush, Sr. on 9/11 and were secretly flown out of country on government jets to escape embarassment, and avoid them being lynched in the aftermath (How Bush knew it was Usama when it happened, I leave for you to decide). Any questions on it beyond this I must advise you to go research it as there is alot on it.
JamieBurnside: I am trying to double space now and hope this works so thanks for the advice and hope you'll return.
E.Macy: Thank you. Some see me as a Democrat if I oppose anything Bush does, but glad you can see I am neither Republicrat nor Republicrat.
Bush is vulnerable to the truth on about any issue and could lose to 'logic' were it run against him. He may well just be inept and unable to run a re-election campaign, or is too out of touch with America to realize the issues we want addressed. He may also have a few billion he's socking away and can't get at it if he is in the Presidency another 4 years. I tend to think Bush, Sr. did this. All his Knighthood and other awards from the private sector were a good trade-off for his surrendering the quarter million+ fringes, a President gets.
I just think something is in the works for Kerry to come out of nowhere and all of a sudden be a leader making money on matching funds. Two months ago he had his half of one of his homes mortgaged. Now he's flush and a front-runner. Hmmm. Again, Why? How? Just innocent questions and let's see what shows up. Skull& Bones is just the beginning of it. We got things on his control of letters from Libya he hid for over 10 years and now magically show up with money flowing to Libya and debt write-offs. Why? see? it's easy. When you find anomalous behavior and events, just ask, why? and think, instead of dis-connecting and letting Dan and Pete tell you after this station break at 6:30.
Brad: I'll spare you the trolling ckick for now. I appreciate any reply however it may disaagree. But you know this already and thanks for the reply.
Charles Poore: very insightful comment and I hope others will get to ready your blogs as it is helpful.
WiseFawn: thanks
Poet philosopher: Thanks for the reply. I recommend your blog as well.
For the rest I thank you for your replies. Glad it got overall thoughtful replies and hope it makes us think and ask, "WHY?" rather than let our reality be fed to us through the cathode ray nipple. Got to go feed dogs now ( I hate dogs but what can I do, My family loves them)so till then, Blog ON.
