| Scott Ritter said there were no WMDs in Iraq. He also pointed out that the alumninum tubes that Bushie, Condi, and Colin were raging about were incapable of being used in nuclear weapons production. Which turned out to be true. Along with the fact there are no WMDs in Iraq. |
Scott Ritter was not that stupid. Scott Ritter said he did not think there were any WMDs. He did not say there were none. YOu cannot coprehend facts can you?
| I also wouldn't call the Pope, and millions of people across the world that protested going to war absolutely no one. |
Let me splain to you Lucy. NO ONE SAID THERE WERE NO WMDS. Lots were agains the war. You still are bereft of facts to back up your stupid statements.
| Kerry, Hillary's and Teddy's faults are that they wimped out and would stick by their beliefs when it mattered, and that is sad. It is a sad commentary on the "democratic leadership" that they couldn't find their backbone. |
So you agree that they were right at first when they said there were WMDs> You contradict yourself again.
| Is it so difficult to believe that Condi would lie to push an agenda? |
That is not the question. Do you have proof that she lied, or do you just routinely call anyone who does not agree with you a liar? You are bordering on slanderous.
| There was a preponderance of evidence supporting the claim that Iraq had destroyed their weapons program. |
Produce it. Apparently most of the intelligence communities of the world and some of the best experts on Iraq could not. I guess that makes you a super genious, and you with held that from the world? Very arrogant of you!
| Also, I'd hardly call Joe Wilson a liar. His and his wife's lives have been placed at great risk by someone within the State Department that choose - either intentionally or not - to release the name of his wife and the fact that she is a CIA operative. |
First, there is documented evidence he is a liar. Google it if you know how. Second, he was the one that outed his wife. Check his interview with Russert in July of 03. Third, she is not an operative! She is an analyst! Try to get at least one fact straight!
| What about the head of counterterrorism Richard Clarke? He also said that Iraq had no ties to bin Laden or WMDs? There was evidence everywhere. It was simply ignored. |
Finally, no you are wrong again. He said his warnings about 911 were ignored! Warnings that were only made in his notes, not in any official record released to date (so they may be classified for now). He never stated no connection or no WMDs. He said Bush dropped the ball.
In the end, you have no facts, mostly lies, and just ignorant statements. Go back to DU where you belong. You are not even a good opponent to debate as you have nothing to debate. At least the liberals here, for the most part, argue from a point of fact, not lies and conjecture.
