"Hate Crime" legislation is nothing more than a way to infuse the thoughts of the accused into the trial and sentencing. I a person rapes a woman, does it matter to the judge and jury whether the guy did it because she was hot and he could no longer control his sexual urges, as a means of lashing out against his feelings of inadequacy with women, or just extreme violent tendencies? Usually not. However, if the victim was a member of a protected group, all of the sudden his thoughts do matter (whether they had anything to do with his actual reasoning or not).
If an Mr. Romano's assailants attacked him out of a love of violence, would it then make sense to call it a "Love Crime"???