[Look, how many criminals---drug dealers, theives, rapists, murderers, child molesters (oh, sorry, that one's a "lifestyle choice", right?) here in America get off on technicalities even though they, and we, know they're guilty as hell? They get off and go out and do it again...and again.....and again....] This I agree with whole heartedly, and nothing makes me more pissed of than to see these people walk because of laws put in place to protect those who have commited no crime, and would dearly to see some of these laws reviewed.
[You know as well as I do that the people we have in custody wouldn't be there if they hadn't been captured in the act of committing terrorist acts or for their connection to terror organizations like al-Quaeda; at least they're off the streets. If we put them on trial and we get some looney, touchy-feely, liberal judge who wants to make a show that it isn't a kangaroo court, they could get back out there, and do it again.....and again.....and again.....and maybe, just maybe, they'll come and do it to you....or your family or friends; and you'd have been one of those in favor of giving them that chance. Would you like that? I wouldn't.]
I also agree that the best place for those who would attack us is jail, however the case against them still has to be proved, why because all have to get equal justice, otherwise if we start removing these laws we create a dangerous situation for those who are innocent. It also creates a precedent for those same people for justifying their cause, most us would agree that most criminals get what they deserve, its just getting them there that is difficult, but to say we should bypass the law in an attempt to make sure they the guilty do not get away, will do nothing for our justice system/s nor our image oversaes, again giving further fuel to the arguments to those who would recruit these people and to those that support them, its a catch 22 I know, but using what may seem to be obvious is not neccessarily the correct route.
