This is not a very good test, because I'm not sure what they mean by "right". Fiscally right? Socially right? Given my outcome (http://www.politicalcompass.org/printablegraph?ec=8.88&soc=-5.49) I have to assume "right" to them means "economically right" because you can't get much more socially tolerant than me.

I find some questions rather impossible to answer. For example: 

If economic globalisation is inevitable, it should primarily serve humanity rather than the interests of trans-national corporations.

The question assumes that "serving humanity" is the opposite of "the interests of trans-national corporations". I happen to believe that joint stock corporations represent (at the very least a subset of) humanity and that thus what serves them, i.e. what serves investors (including pension funds), serves humanity just as much as anything that serves any other subset of humanity.

I don't agree that only service to specific groups considered important can be said to be "service to humanity".

It is regrettable that many personal fortunes are made by people who simply manipulate money and contribute nothing to their society.

Wow!

So what do I say? Do I agree? I don't think that personal fortunes are made by people who "simply manipulate money and contribute nothing". I happen to understand banking and finance a bit and I know that what many regard as "contributing nothing" actually allowed for all of the major improvements society underwent in the last 400 years.