Automatic Burger Machine: Coming soon to a McDonalds near you

By on August 14, 2013 3:39:50 PM from JoeUser Forums JoeUser Forums

Draginol

Join Date 03/2001
+102

imageAs pressure mounts to raise the wages of fast food workers, advocates may want to take note that such wage increases eventually pass a threshold where it makes financial sense to simply invest in automation. As Grocery Store cashiers learned, these jobs are not a given. We are all competing not just with each other but with robots. 

One of the primary reasons that the gap between the rich and poor has increased so much in the past 20 years has been the rise in IT.  Once we purchase a computer, robot, etc. its capabilities – its output and productivity are owned by the buyer which increases the wealth generated by that person.

As people demand McDonalds pay workers $15 an hour and the government insists that they also provide health care, restaurant owners are increasingly evaluating whether to simply replace their work force with machines.  

Naturally, in 2017 when today’s “living wage advocate” is ordering their Big Mac from a friendly touch screen and having it delivered momentarily by a robot they’ll make no connection between how their beliefs resulted in more people living in poverty. Instead, they’ll blame McDonalds. They’ll blame greedy restaurant owners. But they won’t consider that perhaps it wasn’t such a good idea to price people out of their workforce.

More reading:

http://singularityhub.com/2013/01/22/robot-serves-up-340-hamburgers-per-hour/

http://www.thestar.com/business/2012/11/29/automatic_burger_machine_could_revolutionize_fast_food.html

Locked Post 152 Replies
Search this post
Subscription Options


Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
August 18, 2013 3:18:35 PM from Elemental Forums Elemental Forums

Quoting werewolf,
And the reason that so many of them are holding serious reserves right now has nothing to do with greed. It is because running a company requires the ability to forecast projects' success or failure over a period of months or years. Companies will happily spend money when it is going to generate a positive return. The problem is that right now there is so much uncertainty in the economy that companies can't forecast into the future. What you see as "Greed" is actually just good management. You don't spend $1M on a project if you can't predict reasonably well its success (or your wasting your shareholders' money).

Indeed how could holding reserves be greed? They don't pay themselves that money it is theirs to begin with, they have just decided to sit on it because they don't feel safe without having some cash stashed away. It costs them to do this as they could be investing that money. They don't want to do it and it doesn't benefit them.

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
August 18, 2013 3:33:20 PM from WinCustomize Forums WinCustomize Forums

Lets not play it off like we didn't know all along that greed is generally the driving force of success. To be successful generally one has to have a degree of greed in them. That touch of "I want more" lends to drive folks to go the extra mile trying to get ahead.. Without it IMO many successful companies wouldn't be here today, employing hundreds of thousands of people...  But when rampant greed sees one treating their work force more like a liability than an asset, is when folks start getting unhinged.

The company I work for which was built on Unionized work force, has recently declared that they no longer need us, laid us off and brought in an all new "less expensive" non-union work force, claiming that times are hard and they need to reinvent the company to streamline profit. (many of us had been there for over 20 years).. they didn't lay off 4 office buildings worth of Management, Just those who actually do the work, ( is a construction company, Without it's labor force, management wouldn't have paper to push..) 

I personally have been thanked by the VP of the company, the Executive safety officer and most upper management in the various divisions all over the U.S. I have come in contact with over the years, for my outstanding work ethics, my diligence and attention to detail, my care and dedication to the company, keeping my equipment in mint condition, and my over all professionalism on the job. Ive got dozens of safety awards, kudos, and gleaming recommendations coming from them. But  even with all that praise and back-patting, I was still deemed too expensive to keep around. Sad part is my pay check is a mere fraction of what most of theirs are...

Yeh I believe a touch of greed is a pre-requisite to being successful, but when it comes to back stabbing the people who got you where you are today...that's when shit gets ugly..

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
August 18, 2013 7:04:12 PM from WinCustomize Forums WinCustomize Forums

Greed Shmeed. Call it whatever you want but the fact remains that by sitting on all that cash and not hiring AMERICAN workers these companies are not growing the economy. Some outsource to India and The Philippines. Some have their products made in China.

Since 2001 something like 50,00 factories have closed in the U.S. Millions of jobs lost to Mexico or China yet a lot of those companies are sitting on all those profits. So yes when this sort of greed guts our labor force and throws people into poverty. I think that is wrong. It should be against the law.

Then there are all these excuses about The Affordable Care Act and UNCERTAINTY. Quit Whining. Man up. Deal with it. They don't really care about growing the economy and having a viable middle class. The quick buck is all they care about. The bottom line is on instant profit. Whatever happened to investing in the future of our country and our country was the middle class.

It's all so frustrating to see and any of you who are well to do who work for any of these companies I mean you no harm when I say this: If you ever lose what you have because one of these companies outsourced your job overseas or laid you off because they made bad decisions and now you are paying for it then you'll see what it's like to see your retirement money get pissed away and have to work at just above the poverty level. Worrying every day after working your ass off for over 40 years. Living like that is horrible. I know. I don't go on Facebook anymore because it made me so heart sick to see people actually going places and enjoying life. My line of work is newspaper production. Enough said about that.

Quoting HG_Eliminator,
I personally have been thanked by the VP of the company, the Executive safety officer and most upper management in the various divisions all over the U.S. I have come in contact with over the years, for my outstanding work ethics, my diligence and attention to detail, my care and dedication to the company, keeping my equipment in mint condition, and my over all professionalism on the job. Ive got dozens of safety awards, kudos, and gleaming recommendations coming from them. But even with all that praise and back-patting, I was still deemed too expensive to keep around. Sad part is my pay check is a mere fraction of what most of theirs are...

That's so nice of them to thank you but at the end of the day you don't have a job. Those people have big balls to do that. Personally I'd like those people to get kicked right in their big balls. Thank you very much.

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
August 18, 2013 8:48:23 PM from Elemental Forums Elemental Forums

Riddle me this:

What happens in a Consumer driven economy when you continually reduce the number of viable consumers?

If Joe is replaced by automation, then he can no longer afford to purchase a new car. Without that sale then bill the car salesman has to cut back on his fast food habit. Now Jim the fast food franchise owner has less money to spend on his liquor habit. Etc etc etc

 

Its funny because I work for one of those major "evil" corporations, and as sales drop they are continually cutting labor costs while spending crazy money on things like having elton john perform at the stock holders meeting and giving the senior management bonuses/raises, and I just laugh cause long term they are cutting their own throats. (especially considering they are the largest employers in the U.S.)

As sales continue to be lower than expected they continue to blame it on everything else without even thinking about the impact that the reduction in both the numbers of their own labor force and the amount of hours they pay the existing labor force (read extra spending money) has on their own sales. Not to mention the overall economy.

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
August 18, 2013 9:04:38 PM from Little Tiny Frogs Forums Little Tiny Frogs Forums

What a great discussion here.

With regards to how workers are categorized, they're always regarded as a "cost". That's just accounting. Companies have Revenues and they have Expenses.  There's nothing wrong with being an "expense". It means that people (stock holders) find value in them.  It is certainly a lot better than being a liability.

When a business owner (be it a tiny company or a large company) looks at their monthly budget, they have to look over all their costs. That includes employees, utilities, rent, marketing, accounting, legal, cost of goods sold, etc.  

Most entrepreneurs are driven by making the best quality product. This is important because I've never heard of an entrepreneur who starts a company so that he or she can have employees. In fact, I find the very thought a little disturbing. I hate telling people what to do (I am infamous for how I react when someone tries to tell me what to do). I just want to make cool stuff.  This matters because if I can end up with a better product, I will tend to do whatever I have to do to do that.  If that means I have to "outsource" something I'll do that. If it means I pay people more money so that I can attract top-tier talent, I'll do that.  And in the case of someone running a burger place, it means that if they can lower their production costs and afford higher quality ingredients instead (which makes them more competitive) and have the same profit level, they'll tend to do that.

BTW, the McDonald's study I saw someone post is completely bogus. It's important to remember that McDonalds, the corporation, is a franchiser in the main. So its expenses aren't very reflective of what a restaurant's expenses are. What a study should do is look at the expenses of a particular restaurant (which would be a lot easier you'd think) and go from there.  

 

 

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
August 19, 2013 4:31:40 AM from WinCustomize Forums WinCustomize Forums

Quoting Frogboy,
If it means I pay people more money so that I can attract top-tier talent, I'll do that.

 

I wish more board members and upper management had this sort of mentality, typically it's whats the cheapest while keeping the quality loss to a minimum.. in some cases quality of the work and end product suffer greatly as they milk the company dry before filing bankruptcy.

Which is what i think is my case, the execs trying to boost their dividends while systematically running the company right in to the ground. By selling off everything not nailed down,reducing the crews to a skeleton and dropping union workers for untrained labor. I figure another few years and they will sell off the remainder of hollowed out shell of a company they bought 10 or so years ago..Thus effectively destroying one of the most well known and oldest construction company's in the US.

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
August 19, 2013 7:43:08 AM from Elemental Forums Elemental Forums

It often takes time for people's perception of your quality to drop after you drop the quality.

 

This is why cutting labor costs is so tempting- it doesn't drop the quality of what you already produced, just the future quality- and with corporations being focused on the short-term, that's super-tempting. 

 

Unfortunately, there's no real solution to this that wouldn't be equally stupid.  You can't legislate companies to keep workers outside of Ayn Rand fantasy slop. 

 

Personally,  I don't agree with minimum wage laws- because I feel they mask inequality.  I prefer the Friedman living stipend amount listed above, as I think that normalizes the labor-capital market to produce a more free-market outcome.

 

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
August 19, 2013 8:27:54 AM from Elemental Forums Elemental Forums

Quoting HG_Eliminator,

I wish more board members and upper management had this sort of mentality, typically it's whats the cheapest while keeping the quality loss to a minimum.. in some cases quality of the work and end product suffer greatly as they milk the company dry before filing bankruptcy.

I think they do have this mentality, at least at most companies.  My day job is for one of the companies sure to be listed anytime you ask someone to name the "10 most evil" or "10 worst" or any such list of companies in America.  It's a company that has gone through serious well publicized reorganization over the last 5 years including laying off thousands of employees and has received no end of bad press because of all of it.  

I'm with the company precisely because their board realized that they needed to improve drastically in some areas of their business and, despite ongoing re-orgs and layoffs, decided they needed to spend more in other areas to get better talent.  (NOTE:  I'm not saying they decided to hire me specifically, I'm not that important, but the specific hiring program that brought me into the company was a result of this 'must spend more to get better' mentality).  Once companies cross into the large corporation realm it's never as simple as "keep people" or "lay them off".  Layoffs and hiring programs are themselves strategic programs just like new products are.  They are considered both on individual merits, that is the benefits of laying off group X or hiring in section Y, as well as on their strategic organizational benefits (just like new products are evaluated on how they fit within the company's portfolio of products).  

Quoting HG_Eliminator,

By selling off everything not nailed down,reducing the crews to a skeleton and dropping union workers for untrained labor.

I have no idea in your particular case and won't pretend to speak to that, but as a general rule the bad place that union labor finds itself in today is largely its own fault.  When unions shifted from their industrial revolution focus on actual safe working conditions and assuring a living wage to the modern day collective bargaining for ever-improving pay and benefits no matter what it was only a matter of time before unions priced their members out of the market.  The thing that kept unions going despite this behavior was the lack of an alternative (a unionized company had no other choice but to deal with the labor union in question).  

That changed in the last 15 years as states realized they could offer right to work conditions while still requiring the company meet some minimum level of safety and working condition quality (the original concern of unions). It's the reason companies like Boeing are opening new plants in non-union states and the reason why the Big Three autos have tried to move away from union states.  Those non-union plants will be just as safe and manned by as qualified engineers as the union plants, but at a fraction of the cost which is the only way for those companies to compete globally.  Unions, as a general organizational category, failed at the long game by not making allowances for things like economic conditions under which the company operates.  

A good example is the local teachers unions for the districts around where I live.  Through the last five years, while everyone who works in NYC was going through wage freezes and layoffs and fear of layoffs and ever increasing local property taxes to make up the gaps of exploding public sector expenses, teacher's unions were threatening to strike every year if they didn't get their 6% annual raise, COLA, and increased yearly vacation (as examples among other things).  Because of this, there is a strong public backlash throughout the region against the local teachers' unions, who until recently enjoyed status as an untouchable group.  Entirely their own fault. 

My larger point is that, like almost everything in life, this discussion isn't black and white.  It's not "company X wants to lay everyone off because they are evil" and "company Y pays great because they are the good guys". People here commend SD as a great place to work, but SD received no end of grief after WOM when they laid people off as a result of its bad launch.  Companies operate to stay in business and to protect their shareholders money.  This is the purpose as an organization.  They do this by making good decisions and pushing out good products (or services). Labor is merely a component of that.  It's the failure of our government to provide a stable, predictable environment for companies to operate that has led to the hoarding of cash and the anemic growth.  Under the current economic conditions companies are doing what responsible companies should be doing.  If you want to rage against those at fault, rage against those who create the terrible economic conditions.  

 

 

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
August 19, 2013 10:46:15 AM from Elemental Forums Elemental Forums

http://www.policymic.com/articles/59981/obamacare-strikes-and-forever-21-cuts-employees-hours

 

Related- Forever 21 eliminating full-time work due to increased labor costs (Obamacare)

 

If I could make one change to Obamacare, I would make it where most private employers are banned from offering healthcare to their employees, unless they can prove that their employment would impact the employees ability to receive healthcare in the private market.  (things like sports/entertainment/hazardous jobs would fall in this category)

 

 

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
August 19, 2013 12:23:57 PM from WinCustomize Forums WinCustomize Forums

Quoting Kantok,
but as a general rule the bad place that union labor finds itself in today is largely its own fault. When unions shifted from their industrial revolution focus on actual safe working conditions and assuring a living wage to the modern day collective bargaining for ever-improving pay and benefits no matter what it was only a matter of time before unions priced their members out of the market. The thing that kept unions going despite this behavior was the lack of an alternative (a unionized company had no other choice but to deal with the labor union in question).

That changed in the last 15 years as states realized they could offer right to work conditions while still requiring the company meet some minimum level of safety and working condition quality (the original concern of unions). It's the reason companies like Boeing are opening new plants in non-union states and the reason why the Big Three autos have tried to move away from union states. Those non-union plants will be just as safe and manned by as qualified engineers as the union plants, but at a fraction of the cost which is the only way for those companies to compete globally. Unions, as a general organizational category, failed at the long game by not making allowances for things like economic conditions under which the company operates.

 

But really is it the unions fault or Americas desire for cheaper stuff?

Unions were not deemed greedy for the most part till we started mass importing everything under the sun. Then the demand for the "more costly" home made items dropped like a lead balloon..The Union's were called "greedy" for wanting to keep the American worker at his current level of income while the American manufacturers wanted to drop them down to 3'rd world country wages, so they could "compete with the over flow of cheap imports".

When the import models hit the market years ago, one could purchase 2 of many of the import models offered for the price of a single fullsize American car, Yugo was one of them. Almost over night decimating the American car industry. But It's the greedy unions and the union members to blame?.. No.. It's the American obsession with "bargain prices" no matter what the effect it has on the economy.

It has become our national Past time to blame everyone else but ourselves..

The save a buck now and be unemployed later mentality of the American society has been our Achilles heel for quite a few decades now, and will be till we collapse under our own weight.

 

Really Some jobs like truck driving I'd feel safer with a Union member, than some untrained yahoo with a CDL. Teamsters offers full training on most of the various types of trailers out there. As well as defensive driver courses..It's scary to think of an untrained driver out there hauling 80 tons of death behind him...

 

Before anyone say's "But the government regulates the drivers testing and and regulations".. Really?? think about it.. how many driver's did you see this morning on the way to work that made you ask yourself "how the hell did that moron get a license?" Govenment testing at it's finest..

True professionalism is not relying on barely meeting the minimum requirements of "government testing and regulation", but taking the initiative to go beyond that and educate yourself in all aspects of your chosen profession.

 

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
August 19, 2013 12:49:43 PM from Elemental Forums Elemental Forums

Unions became "Greedy" when the Soviet Union was no longer a threat, and American business interests stopped being concerned about the American worker turning communist.

 

Also Bargain prices- it's hard to be picky when you don't have many resources- it's why Wal-Mart does great in recessions but during improving times they don't do as well (looking at same-store growth here)

 

 

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
August 19, 2013 12:56:11 PM from Elemental Forums Elemental Forums

Quoting HG_Eliminator,


But really is it the unions fault or Americas desire for cheaper stuff?

The thing you are complaining about, the desire to make goods available as widely as possible as cheaply as possibly while still being profitable, is the exact thing that has allowed the human race to reach an unprecedented (and still growing) level of quality of life.  The fact that exotic or expensive goods continue to get cheaper and therefore are more widely available is why even the "poor" in the United States typically have an average of over 1 car per household, a TV, a modern video game system, a computer and have a life expectancy into the 70s (higher once you account for violent crime).  

Eliminate the thing you are complaining about (which is really the driving force behind capitalism) and that all goes away.  We're back in a protectionist society where the poor can't afford quality of life items, where the ability to drive to find work isn't an option and where you don't have household quality of life improving devices like laptops and smartphones and TVs and whatnot.  Again, like most progressive ideas, this hurts the poor disproportionately.  The rich can and will always be able to afford those items whose prices you just drastically increased.  The poor can't. 

Instead of complaining about the "good old days" and how life today is so bad we should take the time to understand that capitalism and human nature are what they are and we should adjust for that.  The problem isn't companies looking to make a profit nor Americans looking for more access to goods.  Those instincts are good and lead to an increased quality of life for consumers (because the only way to continually make a profit is to continually improve or to make your goods more widely available by making them cheaper).  The problem is poorly thought out government programs designed to be the magic bullet cure all of our ills.  They distort the market against some people in favor of others and lead to all sorts of inefficiency and barriers to entry that only end up helping big corporations while hurting both the poor and the entrepreneur.  You can't blame the corporations for that, they are just participants in the system.  You have to blame the people making the rules for making bad rules.  

We keep voting for these idiots despite the fact that their magic bullets repeatedly fail, repeatedly make the problems worse, and half the time are only really designed to benefit political supporters rather than the people they will benefit.  We, the citizens of the US, have incentivized politicians to offer us gimmicks in exchange for real solutions because we'd rather feel good about the nice sounding gimmick than take the time to understand the nuance and complexity of the potential real solutions.   

 

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
August 19, 2013 1:37:16 PM from WinCustomize Forums WinCustomize Forums

Quoting Kantok,
The problem isn't companies looking to make a profit

 

Never said companies trying to turn a profit was bad, but when they start laying off workers not because their losing money, but only to increase their profit margin.."padding their own wallets" then yeh I take issue with it..especially if they use the extra revenues to vote themselves huge raises,...to me that's rampant greed.

Quoting Kantok,
Eliminate the thing you are complaining about (which is really the driving force behind capitalism) and that all goes away. We're back in a protectionist society where the poor can't afford quality of life items, where the ability to drive to find work isn't an option and where you don't have household quality of life improving devices like laptops and smartphones and TVs and whatnot. Again, like most progressive ideas, this hurts the poor disproportionately. The rich can and will always be able to afford those items whose prices you just drastically increased. The poor can't.

Really?? Iphones, Ipads and unlimited data plans are cheap? Interesting...

Growing up in some of the poorer neighborhoods in so Ca., "ghost town" Pomona for example, I watched my mom struggle with 2 jobs at times trying to keep a roof over our head while providing electricity,gas, food and water, and clothing while driving an old pinto, her proudest moment for a long time was buying a 1975 Cordoba in 1984...

All the while most of my neighbors "Parent's" {as many had thier husbands or children's fathers living with them}. sat at home all day, driving newer Mercedes, Volvo's and having all the lavish goodies like color TV's, game consoles etc..Why? welfare.. they didn't buy the cheap stuff either and still don't.... walking around with hair done weekly and nails all done up, gold jewelry, expensive clothes.

Hell many of them live better than I do currently working... and it's not due to bargain shopping..

 

 

 

 

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
August 19, 2013 2:01:54 PM from Elemental Forums Elemental Forums

Quoting HG_Eliminator,


Really?? Iphones, Ipads and unlimited data plans are cheap? Interesting...

Growing up in some of the poorer neighborhoods in so Ca., Pomona for example, I watched my mom struggle with 2 jobs at times trying to keep a roof over our head while providing electricity,gas, food and water, and clothing while driving an old pinto, her proudest moment for a long time was buying a 1975 Cordoba in 1984...

All the while most of my neighbors mom's sat at home all day, driving newer Mercedes, Volvo's and having all the lavish goodies like color TV's, game consoles etc..Why? welfare.. they didn't buy the cheap stuff either and still don't.... walking around with hair done weekly and nails all done up, gold jewelry, expensive clothes.

Hell many of them live better than I do currently working... and it's not due to bargain shopping..

 

If you buy an iPad you're paying a premium for brand name.  Buy a cheap Android tablet.  Get 90% of the functionality for $150 or less.  Hell, buy a N7 and get 100% of the functionality for half the price.  But that's irrelevant.  Think of what you're getting for that price.  10 years ago you would have spent thousands for the same functionality.  

Hell 4 years ago your only choice was an iPad for $500+.  In 4 short years you have dozens of options, some of which are $100.  That's capitalism at work. Companies saw the market created by Apple and realized they could expand it buy offering alternatives that were cheaper, thus bringing tablets to the masses.  I can get my kid a really good tablet for school for $150.  This is a market that largely didnt' exist 4 or 5 years ago and now they're cheap that it's legitimate to save up and get one with a tiny bit of extra money each week.  Capitalism is choice.  You may not get an iPad specifically, but you have a whole host of choices that are cheaper now.  

Your example proves my point.  

The system is certainly flawed and the gaming of the social safety net is part of the problem.  But it's not capitalism that's at fault.  I'll say this again and again because ultimately it's the only point that matters, the fault lies with a government full of politicians who dream up magic bullet solutions without understanding the impact of those solutions, the likely problems caused or exacerbated by those solutions and, in the worst cases, not really designed to solve anything at all but to reward cronies.  

You and I agree that there's a problem.  We even agree on most of what that problem is.  The difference is you aren't willing to see that it's the system that is at fault, not the individual actors within the system.  Greed exists, the profit motive exists, but that's one of the reasons why capitalism works.  Because it aligns the incentives that spur human nature with the greatest possible impact.  When accompanied by the right rules it channels human nature in a productive direction.  Things go awry is when favor-monkey politicians muck around with the rules screwing everything up with either half-assed ideas or fully thought out ideas designed to help political friends at the expense of constituents.  

You're nefarious company, the one that is laying off productive employees solely to pad their executive's leadership?  They'll be out of business before long or they'll sell of a shell of a company and likely take huge losses in the process.  You said so yourself.  The system worked, by punishing bad management. 

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
August 19, 2013 2:34:16 PM from WinCustomize Forums WinCustomize Forums

Quoting Kantok,
The difference is you aren't willing to see that it's the system that is at fault,

 

No ..I never said the government hasn't had a hand in the failings of our economy, their no less culpable than those who have no viable excuse for outsourcing work to foreign interest's other than to fatten an already bulging profit margin.

 

My Point was that, OK we had a some what working economy then we introduced cheap products from foreign markets..US factory's lay off thousands and thousands of employees as the demand for the more expensive American products drops..increasing the size of the poor class as now these folks are jobless.. they now have to buy cheaper stuff..and thus increase the dependency on foreign products..In time the cycle continues as more and more people stop buying the American made products,, trying to save a buck,, essentially putting them selves out of work..

IMO the cycle will continue till the American workforce can no longer earn anything more that what other countries are paying their labor force. So US. companies can compete with foreign manufacturers. I certainly do not like the Idea of having to drop Americas quality of life to match other nations, I would have liked to see them being brought up to ours instead..

 

Quoting Kantok,
If you buy an iPad you're paying a premium for brand name. Buy a cheap Android tablet. Get 90% of the functionality for $150 or less. Hell, buy a N7 and get 100% of the functionality for half the price.

 

Yes but in my experience, the majority of the folks buying the cheaper android, tablets and phones is the shrinking middle class.. I see plenty of folks from lower income household's running around Carrying the "Pricy Status symbols".

 

 

Do i believe the gov needs a reworking to get our economy streamlined? yes. Their current strategy of throwing band-aid's at a gaping wound Is laughable at best, tho the American public seems to eat that shit up faster than my mother in-law at a sizzler buffet.

As long as the Politicians can keep the average American acting like mushrooms, (sitting in the dark and living off what ever crap is thrown their way..)  nothing will change..

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
August 21, 2013 10:55:34 PM from Little Tiny Frogs Forums Little Tiny Frogs Forums

Lets not play it off like we didn't know all along that greed is generally the driving force of success. To be successful generally one has to have a degree of greed in them. That touch of "I want more" lends to drive folks to go the extra mile trying to get ahead..

I've yet to meet a rich person whose motivation in life was material wealth.  Wealth tends to be a byproduct of doing something else.  I never set out to be rich. I just wanted to make really cool stuff.  It's not about wanting stuff. It's about wanting to DO stuff.

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
August 22, 2013 6:26:36 AM from WinCustomize Forums WinCustomize Forums

With regards to how workers are categorized, they're always regarded as a "cost". That's just accounting. Companies have Revenues and they have Expenses. There's nothing wrong with being an "expense". It means that people (stock holders) find value in them. It is certainly a lot better than being a liability.

I understand where you are coming from. You are explaining. The problem here is that people like to be thought of as people, not "costs" and when an average person hears about corporations using those kind of words it makes one feel less than human. Tie that in with data you hear about, corporations sitting on a trillion dollars, 50,000 factories closing in the last 10 years because of out sourcing, unions getting busted, CEO's like Ron Johnson who made a thousand times what the average worker at JC Penny makes and you get a toxic mix. Ron Johnson got bounced but I'll bet he had a golden parachute. In this climate being an "expense" is like wearing a bulls eye on your shirt. That's far from being valued.

I've yet to meet a rich person whose motivation in life was material wealth. Wealth tends to be a byproduct of doing something else. I never set out to be rich. I just wanted to make really cool stuff. It's not about wanting stuff. It's about wanting to DO stuff.

Either cool stuff or the challenge of creating something that is better than what's out there. For some that's it but I am not talking about people like that. People like that and I know a person like that. He is the best person I have ever had the honor of working for. Yes I consider it an honor because he knows the value of a loyal employee. The problem with many "rich" people is that they have what I believe to be the same physiological make up as some serial killers or dictators. I am not saying that they are as evil as that. What I am saying is that they are anti social creatures. They do not connect with normal people. They cannot put themselves in the shoes of a guy working in an oil change place. I don't think that they give a crap about average people except for making money off of them. I think Ayn Rand was this sort of person and that her ideas are a good example of this kind of thinking.

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
August 22, 2013 8:30:18 AM from Elemental Forums Elemental Forums

Quoting Chasbo,

I understand where you are coming from. You are explaining. The problem here is that people like to be thought of as people, not "costs" and when an average person hears about corporations using those kind of words it makes one feel less than human. Tie that in with data you hear about, corporations sitting on a trillion dollars, 50,000 factories closing in the last 10 years because of out sourcing, unions getting busted, CEO's like Ron Johnson who made a thousand times what the average worker at JC Penny makes and you get a toxic mix. Ron Johnson got bounced but I'll bet he had a golden parachute. In this climate being an "expense" is like wearing a bulls eye on your shirt. That's far from being valued.

You're still blaming the players, not the people who control the rules of the game.  The rules of the game determine how people and organizations act.  And for the record you should be glad to be an expense.  I know I am.  It means I have a job and that my company considers me to be of value.    

Quoting Chasbo,

The problem with many "rich" people is that they have what I believe to be the same physiological make up as some serial killers or dictators. I am not saying that they are as evil as that. What I am saying is that they are anti social creatures. They do not connect with normal people. They cannot put themselves in the shoes of a guy working in an oil change place. I don't think that they give a crap about average people except for making money off of them. I think Ayn Rand was this sort of person and that her ideas are a good example of this kind of thinking.

The problem with many "poor" people is that they have what I believe to be the same physiological make up as some sloths or toads.  I am not saying they are as stupid as that.  What I am saying is that they are lazy creatures.  They do not understand the value of work like normal people.  They cannot push themselves to get out of bed on time in the morning like a regular working guy can.  I don't think they give a crap about the fact that they are entirely dependent on other people's hard earned money. 

/sarcasm

Now... don't I sound like an asshole?  In a discussion like this generalizing an entire class of people is unproductive and pointless.  

"Rich" people, as you put it, are no more the shitty Hollywood movie caricatures you make them out to be than poor people are the caricatures I described above.  They're all just people with hopes and dreams and challenges and problems.  In both instances there are the occasional bad eggs in the "group".  But this idea that just because someone is wealthy it makes them some sort of villain is part of our society's problem.  The vast majority of wealthy people are regular, every day people who were very successful at something and should be emulated (their habits, their work ethic, their ability to align their passion with the job, etc).  Just like the vast majority of extremely poor people are sympathetic people in need of a hand.  Taking the extreme example of either as the generalized example is silly, at best, and is useless as a basis of discussion. 

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
August 22, 2013 9:02:15 AM from Elemental Forums Elemental Forums

Quoting Frogboy,
I've yet to meet a rich person whose motivation in life was material wealth.  Wealth tends to be a byproduct of doing something else.  I never set out to be rich. I just wanted to make really cool stuff.  It's not about wanting stuff. It's about wanting to DO stuff.

I guess you haven't met many people in finance.  I have, and most of them despise their jobs.  They're doing it because they can make a pile of money and retire as soon as possible.

You're probably referring to entrepreneurs.

 

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
August 22, 2013 10:02:49 AM from Elemental Forums Elemental Forums

Very cool discussion. Sadly my englisch is not good enough to participate, but i would side me with HG_Eliminator.

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
August 22, 2013 10:16:37 AM from Elemental Forums Elemental Forums

Quoting HG_Eliminator,
IMO the cycle will continue till the American workforce can no longer earn anything more that what other countries are paying their labor force. So US. companies can compete with foreign manufacturers. I certainly do not like the Idea of having to drop Americas quality of life to match other nations, I would have liked to see them being brought up to ours instead..

Which brings us back to this threads main topic. The "reshoring" of American Jobs is already happening. For exactly the reason you said although the details are a little different. Things are starting to be made in America again because robots are becoming even cheaper then Chinese migrant workers. Technology has simply gone past the point where people can make a living pretending to be robots by doing simple repetitive tasks all day. It's not something people enjoy anyway.

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
August 22, 2013 12:31:49 PM from Elemental Forums Elemental Forums

Quoting HG_Eliminator,


IMO the cycle will continue till the American workforce can no longer earn anything more that what other countries are paying their labor force. So US. companies can compete with foreign manufacturers. I certainly do not like the Idea of having to drop Americas quality of life to match other nations, I would have liked to see them being brought up to ours instead..

 

 

I believe that this is the natural end, should we let the free-marketers run their course, but the 1% will not suffer anything from this, and reap nearly the entire benefit in the future.  Regression to the mean.

 

I think we can do better than that, or delay it enough so that technological advancement can outpace the regression to the mean, which is the minimum realistic goal.

 

The regression to the mean of the American workplace benefits those Americans who are immune to this regression, due to being able to use the global markets more effectively- this tends to be the 1% in general.   This creates inequality, and I would define this as an externality- so the free-market fails in this regard, and compensation is needed.  (like any other externality or market-power inequality that distorts the free market away from competitiveness)

 

Quoting Chasbo,



Either cool stuff or the challenge of creating something that is better than what's out there. For some that's it but I am not talking about people like that. People like that and I know a person like that. He is the best person I have ever had the honor of working for. Yes I consider it an honor because he knows the value of a loyal employee. The problem with many "rich" people is that they have what I believe to be the same physiological make up as some serial killers or dictators. I am not saying that they are as evil as that. What I am saying is that they are anti social creatures. They do not connect with normal people. They cannot put themselves in the shoes of a guy working in an oil change place. I don't think that they give a crap about average people except for making money off of them. I think Ayn Rand was this sort of person and that her ideas are a good example of this kind of thinking.

 

I've read studies claiming exactly what you just said.  Plenty of wealthy folks are good people.   However, I've ran into a segment of the wealthy who really view their wealth in a way similar to folks view their achievement points, or a high score in a videogame. 

 

  I also agree with you in your philosophy about Ayn Rand, and why I consider objectivism an outright evil philosophy (note: libertarianism is not objectivism- the best comparison of objectivism is to libertarianism as Al-Qaeda or the Westboro Baptists are to Islam or Christianity)

 

I don't lump in all the rich with psychopaths/serial killers, but there are some out there, and they can cause massive damage, and the shareholder/dividend structure leads those sorts of people into leadership positions, because they are the folks who deliver the dividends and profits the shareholders want in aggregate.  (often the stakeholders have a fiduciary duty to their investors which precludes any ethical considerations)

 

 

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
August 22, 2013 1:01:37 PM from Elemental Forums Elemental Forums

http://www.thenation.com/article/175834/how-become-part-time-worker-without-really-trying#axzz2ciZ707Qy

 

Sorry for the double post, but this is another article that should be read about this discussion.

 

Basically, Obamacare isn't what is causing companies to dump their full-time workers, it's just giving them an incentive to speed up the process.  Also, by proxy, speeding up the day where the poor vote in a class warfare-ish fashion, which I suspect will happen in a generation.

 

Obamacare is directly comparable to the minimum wage increase- as both effectively increase the cost of labor in order to deal with externalities in the labor market that distort the free-market process.

 

 

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
August 22, 2013 1:34:50 PM from Elemental Forums Elemental Forums

Quoting Alstein,


I think we can do better than that, or delay it enough so that technological advancement can outpace the regression to the mean, which is the minimum realistic goal.

The technology already exists the economy just hasn't shifted to a new equilibrium yet.

Quoting Alstein,
http://www.thenation.com/article/175834/how-become-part-time-worker-without-really-trying#axzz2ciZ707Qy

Seems like that company is taking a huge drop in employee skill. I guess they must think it is worth it. Not all companies would agree. I'm not sure you can maintain your status as a fashionable brand when your sales people are all students with no training or incentive.

I've been stuck in the part-time worker trap. However I know who to blame and it's mostly government regulation. If the government says you have to pay full-time more and give them benefits of course companies are going to move to part-time. Government needs to equalize part-time and full-time regulation.  Also workers are facing reduced bargaining power due to high unemployment but I think that will fade as the economy adjusts. Workers will get training and jobs will open up in areas that require more skills. Then part-time will start to earn as much as full-time and companies will start to hire full-time again. Of course that is only in areas that aren't completely replaced by automation.

Software companies are a bad example because they require no physical proximity to consumers. 99% of jobs still do.

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
August 23, 2013 7:23:26 AM from Elemental Forums Elemental Forums

I actually agree with you that there is a part-time worker trap, and it is caused by government regulation in some areas.

That doesn't mean that getting rid of some regulations wouldn't cause a bigger problem.

 

There's a reason why I think a ban on most employers from offering healthcare would be a better solution in the long-term than the employer mandate for Obamacare (I do support the personal mandate with the tax subsidies due to free rider issues)

 

I don't think you can eliminate the minimum wage without putting it a living standard lump sum for society.

 

Overall though, even if it's been proven wrong in the past, I do think we're heading to a point where automation is making many jobs redundant, without good replacements.   The past doesn't always predict the present.

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Stardock Forums v1.0.0.0    #108432  walnut2   Server Load Time: 00:00:00.0001594   Page Render Time:
Facebook Twitter YouTube Google+