Didn't take you long to revert to your normal habit of quoting things I never said. You basically seem to be arguing it's better for the government to spend 3 times as much on child benefits with those children being spread over several families than it is to make those child benefits be used in the most efficient manner (assuming you don't want children+their parents out on the streets starving, which thinking about it is probably a fairly big assumption), since I'm arguing for the 'more efficient' spending and you're disagreeing with me.
---maudlin
Yeah...sorry; old habits die hard, especially when I did it maybe once before. I apologize. Coulda sworn you wrote that, now I can't find it. My fault. You're still an asshole. 
I think the babies should be adopted out to families that can honestly care for them, emotionally and psychologically as well as financially. Then she should be sterilized so it never happens again.
Lots of childless people out there; people with big hearts and homes. How much love, guidance and plain old stability do you think this creepy, whacked-out, self-deluding Angelina Jolie wannabe is going to be able to provide? For 14 kids?
You, on the other hand, want to leave them in the care of this woman, who is obviously suffering from some severe personality and mental issues. I've heard of kids being taken away for much less. Much less.
Yeah, looking after 14 children is 'sitting on your ass doing nothing'. No doubt you aren't the primary carer of any children.
--maudlin
Typical, sad little bleeding heart liberal; that's right dear...when in doubt, nitpick and parse words. Allow me, for a moment, the same priviledge: no, I'm not the primary CAREGIVER of any children. You know perfectly well what I meant; please stop being deliberately dense. She doesn't have a job....as in, gainful, clock-punching, taxpaying employment. She collects the fruits of others labors.
"So you have no problem with a society that leaves women and children to starve on the streets? Because that is the inevitable result if you don't have the government ensure that people can at least survive. Charity will help some people, but not all, since by it's nature it's unreliable."---maudlin, replying to Drag
And the government is a rock? Solid and trustworthy? Governmental bureacracy is a boil on the ass of the world. Can you say Katrina? Can you say the Department of Motor Vehicles, for crying out loud? I'll let a great man speak for himself:
"The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government, and I'm here to help."---Ronald Reagan