Another (as if more are needed) example of Obamacare's (and Obama's) intent - from the gitgo:

link

Then there's this tasty little delicacy.

That is actually pretty terrible and I can see why they redacted it. If you are pro Obama-care and paying attention, this overrides one of the key elements that sold you on it, and would make you very angry.

I'd blame it more on the power of lobbyists though.

Bit of fortuitous timing that I saw this this morning.

Now we know what went down at that White House meeting with all the Dems up for re-election next year.

Obamacare is so good, so desirable for the country, that its customers must be forced to buy it and its administrators indemnified against loss courtesy of (paid by) those same customers.  I've never been fond of insurance companies, but I hate them now, duplicitous bastards.

This is such an unnecessary drain on the treasure of the 50% of us who still bother to work & pay taxes.  Would have been far, far cheaper, and far less disruptive, to give people cash to offset insurance premiums & let them buy what they want.

But the control-freaks have a hard-on that's lasting more than 4 hours and they won't seek help.

There are ways to make the cash available only for a designated purpose, either through tax credits or vouchers.  'Cash' was a figure of speech.  Something akin to a Series E savings bond would do the trick.  Wouldn't be able to force people to use it, but it would be otherwise worthless.  For those who don't voluntarily purchase insurance, there could easily be a way for it to be 'redeemed' first time someone presented for care.

Not perfect, but OCare sure as hell ain't.

Lack of access to centers of excellence and tertiary care centers is now being touted as a feature of Obamacare.  Not shedding tears for the big centers, since most of them were suckered into pushing for its passage way back when.  But I shed tears for the patients who might need them.  Obamacare is forcing all the formerly decently-insured middle class into the equivalent of Medicaid.  All must suffer equally under statism.  Except for the members of the state, of course.

It already is creating the underclass.  While democrats rail against income inequality, it has grown faster and larger under Obama than under any Republican administration.  When you have an elite with all the money, and everyone else that is "free" from work (as Obama is doing), those with the money are going to have a lot more than those who are earning nothing.

Obamacare is a Marxist attack against the Family. Obama and the statists are worse than madmen, he/they are a type of antichrist.

And for sure if we don't wake up and reject State control of our lives, our future in the one world order is not going to be pretty.

"I can do whatever I want." ....Barack Hussein Obama

A Freudian slip?

http://blog.heritage.org/2014/02/11/7-times-obama-whatever-want-presidency/?utm_source=heritagefoundation&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=&utm_content=&utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Morning%2BBell

Now BO's IRS is going to require businesses to certify in writing, under penalty of perjury, that if they reduced their work force from some number greater than 99 to 99 or less that they did not do so because of Obamacare (to get into the waivered group).  I don't believe there is any basis in law for this requirement.  Avoiding a tax (remember, that's what it is, not a 'penalty' or 'fee' - just ask John Roberts) 'legally' by reducing your workforce can't be 'illegal', especially when the waiver being taken advantage of is illegal in the first place (there is no authority in law to grant one).  There is absolutely no statute permitting the feds, least of all the IRS, to dictate how many people work for you or to force you to retain employees to thereby enable them to tax you.  It's now so far beyond insane as to be truly Wonderland stuff.  It's even less justifiable (and more pernicious) if its intended purpose is simply to prevent companies from saying publicly that they cut back to 99 or less because of Obamacare.

Not even George III would have had the temerity to pull this bullshit.  The oath of office meant nothing to the POS we elected, twice no less.  Congress may have a lower approval rating than BO, but I'd bet a large part of that is because people are so pissed off that they're doing diddlysquat about his lawless behavior.  He is simply the most anti-American, evil person ever elected President.  I have no choice but to respect the office, but its current occupant isn't worth the spit he deserves hocked in his face.