Bush Ignored 3 Years of Warnings -- Flu Vaccine Shortage II
By: blogic Posted: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 on The Tide Goes Out Message Board: Politics This is a followup to an earlier post that linked to an article condemning the way the Bush administration responded (or didn't respond) when it learned there be a problem with the production of this year's flu vaccine. While that post was focused on what has happened over the last few months, some of the readers understandably wanted to talk about the deeper issues that have developed over years.
Some of the Bush supporters have argued that the shortage is Clinton's fault. I have trouble following the logic there. Clinton hasn't been president for nearly four years, and was constantly constrained by a Congress controlled by the opposition. On the other hand, Bush is the current president, and has had four years -- working with a Congress controlled by the party he leads -- to deal with this issue. Isn't there a point where Bush supporters don't get to blame Clinton anymore? Are they still going to be blaming Cinton in four years? Eight? The buck stops with George Bush.
Okay, so the conservatives might respond: yes, maybe it's not Clinton's fault, but Bush couldn't have known this was a problem... nobody saw this coming.
Except that's not true. In fact, the General Accounting Office has been warning the Bush administration about this for over three years.
This is from the Houston Chronicle: With such a high level of competition and so much presidential encouragement, it was not surprising that Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson, one of the more garrulous members of the Cabinet, entered the contest this week by claiming that the shortage of flu vaccine "is not a health crisis."
Tell that to the 36,000 people who die annually in the United States, or the 200,000 who are hospitalized, from causes associated with influenza. Those are yearly averages from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as reported by the Government Accountability Office, the agency formerly known as the General Accounting Office.
Formal name changes aside, it's the same GAO that has warned repeatedly over the last four years about the perilous state of vaccine production and distribution. Academics and health professionals outside the government have been as pointed in their periodic alerts. The government response has been anemic.
In May 2001, four months into the Bush administration, Janet Heinrich, director of GAO's health care division, testified before the Senate Special Committee on Aging. The title of her statement could not have been clearer: "Steps Are Needed to Better Prepare for Possible Future Shortages."
Heinrich's testimony was an eerily exacting guide to what is now afoot.
"Manufacturing difficulties could occur in the future and again illustrate the fragility of current methods to produce a new vaccine every year," she said. "Compounding the problem is that when the supply is short, there is no system to ensure that high-risk people have priority for receiving flu shots." I understand that health problems are complicated, but when Bush supporters deny that the Bush administration contributed to this, they're sticking their heads in the sand. |