Censoring someone's free speech because it speaks against you or censoring someone's free speech because of National Sercurity, if I had to choose between the two, which is the case in America and other countries with Democracy as well, I would always support censoring someone's free speech because of National Security.
So my question is:
Why is a prominent nuclear physicist allowed to get away with trading secrets to another nation even if they are an ally scot-free without any punishment than is allowed to go over to that allied country and teach people about what he stole from the United States, while if somebody speaks out against a political candidate in a "non-violent" way gets shouted at and condemned and has people asking the President of the United States to condemn and take away their free speech? Is this the right course? Should we be taking this course out sheer spite of hatred against each other?
As for Bosnia, once again the U.S. is STILL there, when it should have been entirely a UN (mostly European Nations) Action. European Nations, because they are the next door neighbors, if they can't control their own backyard, are we supposed to take advice on what the U.S. should do. If we did, would we just forget our obligations to Korea, Japan, Afghanistan, Iraq, and Bosnia that take precedence over the UN telling us what to do with our obligations, boils down to a Catch 22. Korea likes us, in fact they say we are being to soft with Kim Jong IL, which is probably because it's a messy situation. Japan likes us, even though we differ on some opinions, both cultures seem to be influencing the other, we like Sony, they like the GAP (American styled clothing). As for Bosnia, I am not entirely sure haven't read anything on it, except we should have taken harsher action and ousted Milosevic by force, than again Slovenia who just entered the E.U. has somet hings to say as well on the whole matter as well as Bosnia. Afghanistan and Iraq, it's a religious difference, if we were entirely a muslim nation than who would be complaining, granted the innocent people do get harmed, but when ever you have two sides shooting, and innocent people are around, bullets do stray, ricochet, etc.sad but true. It's funny really Islamic Nations see as a Christian Nation, while Christian Nations don't think we are Christian enough. We are the United States of America, and the last time I checked their was not a single authorized State Religion for the entire US of A, sorry but there is no Church of the United States of America, like England, we are many beliefs, many races, many people, and not one person makes or breaks our nation, we are united in one common thing, we are citizens of the United States of America, and if you don't like it, you have the freedom to speak out about it, and just like Johnny Depp, leave the United States if you hate it so much. Yet the people who seem to hate it so much, must love the country for they stay and keep yelling how they hate it.
It's not a matter of patriotism or unpatriotism (if that's a word), we are FREE to decide who we are and what we are, and the United States Military is making sure that it stays that way, which is why many nations with Tyrants and Loonies hate the U.S. because it is a glaring example and symbol to the people in which they are trying to rule that you can be free to decide your own damn life, just like how we have the freedom to post on this forum. We are the Land of the Free, and Home of the Brave (Turner would like it so say Braves), so I leave you with the FREEDOM to decide on your OWN opinions, and to VOICE those opinions.