President George W. Bush yesterday announced that the U.S. would not support any unilateral steps on the part of Taiwan for it's idependence from China.
What?
This statement could lead and should lead to many commentaries on both sides. However, let's simply look at it from the Amercian Dream side, keeping economic alterior motives independent.
How can the leader of the worlds most succesful democracy, which was founded upon the desire for indepence from a mother nation, essential oppose a people's similar wish? Not only does he not support Taiwan's move for independence, but he also put his bet on a communist nation, China, who refuses to release the "renegade" province. Wait, wasn't the cold war fought over the wrongs of communism? Therefore, this point alone is a one-two punch to the face of Taiwan. "Hey, you small democratic island with similar ideals of early American colonists, not only can you not be independent, but you also have to be communist."
Whoa!
The second item on Bush's verbial platter of political Hagus, was the word "Unilateral." Who should not take unilateral actions? Oh yeah, that whole thing about the U.N. not backing a war in Iraq. That didn't mean anything and it certainly was not a unilateral move. Enough said.
It is just a sad day, when the leader of the free world, verbally tramples on a small nations hopes and dreams for democracy. It looks like Quebec won't ever get Bush's seal of approval.