Why has the RIAA never got the real reason why most people share there audio media-- because of the astronomical cost of purchasing new music the legal way?

I never realized that $1 per song or $15 per CD is considered astronomical. The only acceptable price for such noble pirates is $0.00, eh?

Nonetheless, there is strong evidence that most people P2P for music they wouldn't necessarily buy even if there weren't such a thing as P2P.

I didn't know most people download music they don't like. That's a waste of time, if you ask me. If I was a pirate, I'd download music I like and often listen to.

Furthermore, they more often than not go and buy the music they like and are loyal to regardless of the insane inflated price.

Evidence? (preferably from some source that isn't exaggerating in an attempt to justify piracy)

Of course, I know that even the most hardened pirate needs to rationalize their behavior.