Isn't it good idea to try the game first and then comment on it...
I mean you guys might be right by all means - if its really boring, repetitive, and if after couple of hours all you are left with is MP then you are right...
However, why not wait for 20 or so days and try the final product and then complain!?!?
Just my 2 cents
Because they are still changing and re-working the game, if we wait to complain whats going to happen, we've wasted 56 dollars on a game which is boring long and repetitive with no real reason to play other than multiplayer, which gets old for some people and with the length of the matches anyways all you're going to be left with is a Skirmish mode, which every RTS and it's blind sided cousin has.
Whats the point of going "Oh that'll be perfect!" if we do that, no one at Iron Clad will hear our input on the situation, Story, Good, no story, Bad. And a 2009 release on just the missions? This game is going to be left under the tracks of Star Craft II if the train of thought here is "Well, we don't know how so we just won't do it, maybe the next Expansion or sequel" that's like Microsoft going "Well I know that this OS has a major security flaw, and we all know about it and with a little work and time we could fix it.. But hell, we'll release another one in a few years!"
Difference is they are popularized already and making tons of money, if this game, a new game in the series comes out with half a punch, all the other RTS's are going to one-two it, and this'll probably be the last we ever hear about it!
Personally I am interested, and I really want this game to succeed, but it aint gonna happen if we have to pay full price for Multiplayer, and not so multiplayer

.