lula posts:
Barack Hussein Obama voted against a requirement to make schools filter internet pornography from school computers. Can anyone who's ga-ga over this guy please explain why he won't protect children from evil?
Think Aloud posts:
Filtering things doesnt guarantee anything. all it does is open the door to filtering other things .... which is censorship at large.
Lula posts:
What I have said here is not misleading or giving false accusations.
Thaink Aloud Posts:
Yes it is and I showed you why it is. You conveniently just ignored it. That is typical. You never answer the argument, you just repeat what you say.
I told you how these two votes objected to methods which would not have achieved the objective of "protecting Children" and would have caused other problems. but you still accused him of allowing "evil" to harm children.
He is not against protecting children, and i told you the logic behind those two votes. You didnt even try to adress that. you just continued to reapeat the same wrong accusations.
Think ALoud,
Get real and honest. Internet pornography is evil. With just one click children can bring up a pornographic site, or image, etc. on the screen. Filters are designed to prevent that and thereby protect children from the evil of internet pornography.
All children in this world have a right to be protected from evil....and it is the duty and responsibility for the adults in this world, especially Congressmen, including liberals pushing socialism, like Barack Hussein Obama, to protect our children at every opportunity. Barack Hussein Obama failed miserably on this one opportunity to vote for internet filters and protect children from the evil of internet pornography.
and if his middle name is a criterion for indicating his background and heritage, how come you are not using the same with other candidates?
Barack Hussein Obama's Wahabisim background and Muslim heritage is what it is...be honest and deal with it.
What I have said here is not misleading or giving false accusations. So kindly stop with this direction. Again, he owns his voting record and it is what it is. His voting record is a good way we can measure the candidate.
At most, I've only raised awareness about the man. I trust that people upon knowing the facts about the person and issues can decide for themselves.
and after all those years of being christian, now you question his faith? and on what basis you doing that?
just assumptions on your part or do you have something concrete to tell you he is not faithful to his religion?
Concerning his Christianity......how many years has he been a Christian? I quite frankly dont't know. It certainly wasn't while he was growing up. Yes, I question his profession of faith...(just as I do Rudy Guiliani, a Catholic hypocrite). The basis on which I question Obama's profession of faith is that he obviously prefers man's laws over God's Laws particularly in obedience to the Commandment, "Thou shalt not kill" which certainly includes innocent, defenseless babies in the womb. In 2002, he voted against a bill to protect babies that survived failed abortions. These positions contrast 100% with keeping the Christian faith.
but we must present the facts in an honest way not put it in a way to achieve political goals. He is not against protecting children,
Well, the facts are...he is..and that's all there is to it.
Or was your objective is to create doubt in other people's minds and just leave it at that? that is exactly what is dishonest and deceitful about your "under the radar" strategy.
There is nothing I've said here that is "under the radar". Calling me dishonest and now deceitful or saying that I've falsely accused or been misleading is getting tiring. It also doesn't change the facts one iota about Barack Hussein Obama character and voting record.
