When Universal Health Care is portrayed as socialized medicine while in fact it is more efficient and less expensive for all than the current system which only benefits the Insurance Companies..... Is that legitimate?
Universal health care is portrayed as socialized medicine because it IS socialized medicine, however you slice it. I believe we need to fix a broken system, but the proposals on the table aren't the way to do it.
Few of us are old enough to remember it, but hospitals used to be charitable organizations. It really is within my lifetime that the serious push to make them corporations began. When they were non-profits, they were more able to accomodate the needs of the indigent; as long as they are corporations, return on shareholder investment will ALWAYS be a primary concern! This means rural areas get the axe (can't make a profit unless you can pull in volume), and those who cannot pay will always get the short end of the stick.
When "getting the government off your back" is portrayed as less taxes while in fact it makes almost everyone pays much more in property taxes, college education, local services for maintaining roads and school buildings, ..Etc than what they save from Fed Taxes ... Is that legitimate?
Giving state responsibilities to state governments won't raise taxes, it will reduce federal taxes and allow residents the CHOICE at the state level. Suddenly, I don't have to pay for a Boston road project or an LA bridge. I can help ensure that funds are raised where I live and work, and SPENT where I live and work.
When deregulation of the communication industry results in more filth and violence on public airwaves and portrayed as less interference by government ... is that legitimate?
And yet every TV has an "off" button. Glad to see you're no friend of the First Amendment here...
When a program results in mass exodus of manufacturing jobs from the country to foreign lands and portrayed as giving Businesses the freedom to operate where it is more efficient.... is that legitimate?
NAFTA was signed into law by one William Jefferson Clinton. Last I checked, the man is not a member of the GOP.
When a program is intended to increase emissions of air pollutants and is called "Clear Skies" ... is that legitimate?
Let's talk for a moment about "carbon credits", the darling program of the left. How does allowing a company to buy pollution credits eliminate pollution, exactly? How does using more electricity in a month than most Americans use in a YEAR (Al Gore) helping to reduce our impact?
Yes, our politicians are lying to us, but they are Republican and Democrat alike. We need real solutions, and Washington isn't providing those.