jeez joe...i'll reluctantly agree with this part:
If you repeat something often enough, people will decide it's true. Even smart people
your article and 2/3 of those comments it's elicited til now support your claim.
but then you hadda go here:
People like the reporters at the Washington Post, who reported yesterday Barack Obama is a closeted muslim.
it's been a damn long time--so long, in fact, i can't point to a month (much less a date) nor even a specific year for absolute certain--since the last time i chose sincerity over sarcasm, but i'm really trying here even though i'm sure it won't seem that way when i ask: did you read the post's article yourself?
perhaps they published two of em and this is the other one?
Foes Use Obama's Muslim Ties to Fuel Rumors About Himotherwise, i'm atta loss.
that linked article is something totally different than whatever it is about which you're fulminating.
check out the 2nd graph in which obama is very accurately reported to be:
'a member of a congregation of the United Church of Christ in Chicago'post writer perry bacon jr to whom the article is attributed seems to have done a more than adequate job of directing public attention to a pernicious scheme to smear barak, investigating its origins and providing the candidate an opportunity to refute it with his own words.
seems to me your outrage and indignation would be much more appropriately directed at the professional hatemongers and deluded assholes responsible for brewing up this particular biohazard.
to be clear--and for those who didn't read far enough into the article or any of it--bacon mentioned several by name: jeffey kuhner, editor of 'insight', robert spencer of 'human events' (two conservative publications more aptly titled 'lies n bullshit'), mark savage and, last but hardly least, opiate addled rush limbaugh who goofily claims to confuse obama with osama bin laden.