Agreed with some, disagreed with others, glad to hear all of them from you!
11. Trying to resond to criticism about not covering enough feel good Iraq stories is stupid. When a situation is crap, report that. Show us.
I would agree, but add, "We don't need 'feel good' stories, but when our troops do well, or a city has power that never had it before... that's not 'feel good' that is examples of success!
Also
Why is good news from the war "propaganda", but everything the enemy leaders put on video or audio tape is "news"?
If you hear that over 100 people were murdered in the Superdome, but you didn't actually see any bodies... it probably didn't happen...
If it did happen, the bodies are kept in the freezers down stairs, get off your butt and look in the freezers before sensationalizing what you know is a lie.
What good to politicians do in a disaster area... if they don't drop everything to get there, that's probably a good thing.
If we read the facts of the story before you print a "correction" to your original report, you failed at your job.
If all it is is a photo op, tell us. Maybe then photo ops will be replaced by photo coverage of actual events.
When you are doing your "on the scene" live report, all those disaster recovery, EMS, fire and other emergency workers hear you, and know you are lying through your teeth... and we tell everyone about it later.
and my personal favorite...
I don't care if you are "the press", your Constitutional Right to cover the story of the flood does not exempt you from the laws of physics. The Snake River doesn't care about your Constitutional Right to get the perfect shot of the flood, it will sweep your van away just like anyone else's. (ask me about that funny story sometime). ;~D