such entries as “Inconvenient Truth” and its ilk of melodramatics ticks off those of us who don’t want to change our stubborn ways of consuming—big cars, big homes, abundance of appliances and gadgets—upsetting our convenient truths, |
See, that is not the major objection to the new religious propaganda offerings. My objection, and many like me, comes in is in 2 parts.
First, while we do not deny that global warming exists, we have yet to see any empiracle data to suggest that it is caused by man. Pollution is a problem, and should be dealt with because of its inherant ill effects. but that does not mean it is causing global warming. You are old enough to remember the rage of Global Cooling 30 years ago.
Second, and it follows from the first, since we do not know what is causing global warming, trying to "fix" it may make the problem worse. It is akin to a surgeon not knowing why a patient is not feeling well, so he goes in to do a kidney transplant. Bad news. Sometimes it is better to do nothing when you do not understand the problem or what you are doing.
if this period of global warming is a natural one, and we somehow effect a climate change to stop or reverse it, then what happens when the earth goes through another period of global cooling (which some climatologist claim will happen in about 15 years)? Instead of having cold winters, we might have cold summers as well!
Quite frankly, the data showing man is responsible for global warming is fatally flawed. it requires the interpreter to ignore key decades, and squint to see relationships that have not been proven to be cause and effect, and indeed are better suited to be effect and cause.