and what would be your solution to what they should do with the fetuses? putting the abortion question aside for a moment, the fact remains that after a fetus is aborted, there are only a limited number of things that can be done with it. either they are going to try to use them for some sort of research or they are going to properly dispose of them. describing a proper disposal in the inflammatory way you do trying to make it sound improper is laughable.

tell me, what is the proper way to dispose of something properly? from what i know, you put it into a container, take it to a proper holding place to be picked up by a waste management company to be transported to a safe, government approve disposal site. that seems to be exactly what they do.

i agree about it's awaste to have the abortion to begin with. i personally abhor abortion.

but using the use of the fetus to further inflame the pro life crowd is not right in my view. the fact is that once the fetus is aborted, something must be done with it, and those choices are limited.

i ask, what would be your suggestion on what to do with the aborted fetus? if pro-lifers care so much about this, why don't they pull these fetuses out of the dumpsters or make an arrangement with the clinics and give these fetuses a christian burial? but that doesn't happen. just more inflammatory rhetoric.



that is just wrong. that implies that fetuses are aborted for the purpose of study. like there are scientists standing around trying to "up the quota" because they don't have enough to work on.

nonsense.

ok, now you are going WAY over the line...comparing scientists to nazis. you should know better than that...oh that's right, you don't care. you just care about winning an argument.



Nonsense.

WWW Link

plus it's funny how ya wanna embrace science now...BAHAHAHAHA!!!!

well, it is my blog. i'm not going over to your blog and starting crap by using the same old parroted lines and using as much inflammatory language and terminology as possible.

do you see anything disrespectful or childish towards you in the article? no, you didn't. that only happens when you start with me. you seem to think i have some obligation to seriously entertain every crack-pot idea you spew at me,,,i don't. i wrote my article, and stand by it.

but the fact remains that whenever someone mentions secularity in our government, wing-nuts like you want to take everything down to abortion and other wedge issues. then all you want to do is paint the opposition as slithering , greedy for more blood, psychopaths following in the tradition of nazis.

and sister, crap like that will never be taken seriously by me and will always be called out for what it is...hate filled, ignorant propoganda.

and on stem cells, you are wrong...you should have read on.

except that is not what happens. most of these stem cells will be properly discarded, or "thrown in a dumpster and taken to a landfill" as lula would put it. do you think that we have endless resources to store these things?

no life is being wasted, period.

SANCHONINO POSTS:


I have to agree that most oftentimes it comes down to money being thrown into the mix. However, this is not the case with embryonic stem cells (ESC).

The clear facts are that both ESC and adult stem cells have been tested and EST to not perform or produce helpful tissue.

Just last month, the American College of Pediatricians called for an end to ESC research and recommended the exclusive support of already proven effective adult stem cell research. These people understand that shuffling money to ESC is a waste of money when it could be going toward adult stem cell research which has shown astounding promise.


The following is a quote from the report. Dr. Michelle Cretella wrote, "Not only does embryonic research require taking the life of human embryos, it also prolongs needless suffering by delaying the development of more promising adult stem cell treatments and cures."

Research using non-embryo sources of stem cells, including amniotic fluid, umbilical cord blood, placenta and adult blood, fat and various organs, have yielded impressive results.

These results include the routine use of adult stem cells in certain forms of cancer therapy. Over the last decade, these cells have been used to successfully treat spinal cord injuries, heart failure, Parkinson's disease, diabetes and dozens of other conditions in human trials.

Instead, embryonic stem cell trials have produced the wrong tissue, forming tumors and triggering immune rejection.

"Every dollar spent on the failed and unnecessary process of embryonic stem cell research, steals resources away from the potential of adult stem cell research. This is fiscally irresponsible and medically unconscionable," said a statement from the American College of Pediatricians.

KFC POSTS:



Exactly, KFC. No use mincing words...it's a no brainer. The ends never justify the means. Never. To quote George Orwell.."To see what is in front of one's nose requires a constant struggle."