NASA's boss stated that there was nothing we could do.
who,
Dr. Michael Griffin?
is he an ecologist? is he a meteorologist? is he a geologist? is he a climatologist?
no, he's an administrator and an engineer. it doesn't matter if he trusts anyone because his opinion is no more valid than yours or mine. without a career of research in a field actually related to the question at hand, i have no way to know if he's any more or less informed than i am, though i'm pretty sure he and i are both more informed than you.
plus, Bush put him in his current office, which tells me a lot about what he'll say in public and what he won't.
as for green candidates guess what you burn corn juice instead of dinosaur juice your still polluting.
okay, GE's "think green go yellow" campaign has little to do with voting, and i never said it was better than pentrolium fuels. frankly if we switched all engines over, we'd be worse off due to rapid soil erosion and the extreme amount of water vapor (another greenhouse gas) that we'd be emitting. the real answer is a renewable and low-impact energy source, for example solar power or controlled fusion.
GE's campaign has more to do with cashing in on their investement in government-subsidized corn (also the reason corn syrup is used as a sweetener instead of sugar in so many american products).
has nothing to do with global warming
did you not see me write, "the environmental predicament is a lot bigger than just global warming" in my last post? are you spastically responding one sentence at a time, or do you just like to appear foolish?