danielost


“You know more than anyone else on the planet what I post are facts that appear on a variety of sources.”

YOUR problem is that when any facts appear to reflect poorly on Bush and the policy we are following you want to make believe it is not valid or do not exist. It is clear that many who support Bush act like him and live in a state of DENIAL. For the dead and Injured in this war they have faced the intimate reality. Bush and those misguided supporters will not change this reality. When people on this Blog Site refuse to accept the truth and attack me they show their true colors. They are too stupid to realize they are NOT attacking me but the many sources that bring these facts to the public knowledge.

In August when it is clear this Surge (the latest in four similar surges) is shown to not have ended the violence in Iraq, there will be some other excuse. One thing that Bush and his supporters can not claim is that the ENTIRE Iraq War Policy was BUSH Not Clinton, Not the Democrats or the BOGGIE MAN. Just BUSH!

I hear more and more about how GWB is concerned about his Legacy. No need to worry, the George W. Bush Legacy is already written in STONE and it is a DAMMING legacy to be sure!

all liberal sources designed to make bush look bad




this is the samething that hitler and saddam and all the other dictators say. if you attack me then you are attacking the country becouse i am only doing what is best for the country.




i don't recall anyone saying it was supposed to end the violence just less of it
which is what is happening where the surge is supposed to be working right now.

yes more people are getting hurt but that is becouse the more weapons are getting through to them



is the couse of 9/11 not bush. and you know that to do something like 9/11 takes years to plan not months. of course if you were in supply as i suspect then you wouldn't know.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/in_depth/baghdad_navigator/

go here they have a chart that shows the number of deaths to be about the same as in 2003. civilian deaths


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6451841.stm

and here are some iraq polls stating that things are better now than when saddam was in charge.

of course the bbc says it is getting worse but the numbers on the chart tell a different story

all liberal sources designed to make bush look bad

To you any source that reports ANYTHING that you deem is not flattering toward Bush and his policies is LIBERAL. That is BS. You are the one saying something is Bush Bashing. If the information is correct it is YOUR estimate that the information does not reflect well on Bush not that the story is incorrect. I sighted Powell, Baker, Armitage and the CIA about the warnings they gave Bush BEFORE he invaded Iraq that it could result in getting us bogged down in a Civil War. Which one of those sources or individuals is a LIBERAL for example?

what resources

name them

and are any of them conservitive

by the way i went to the web page for the army college and they didnt say anything about the war in iraq

by the way i went to the web page for the army college and they didnt say anything about the war in iraq

Better look at Professor Record articles which I sight in my book that says, " the Bush policy fails to understand a difference nature of terrorism from groups like al-Qaeda and rogue states such as Iraq, Iraq and North Korea."

and becouse bush has done all of this

you condem the troops

nope couldn't find that link

you are using figuares from 2003 to tell people how things are going now

joe biden just said that he would send in troops to sudan

how big of a threat is sudan to the usa

Reply By: Texas Wahine Posted: Monday, May 21, 2007
"support the troops" is code for "support the war"

What war are we to support? The Civil war that resulted when we removed Saddam and allowed the factions within Iraq to organize, arm and begin fighting to gain power? Which side should we support-- The Kurds, Sunni or the Shea? The fighting by the foreign elements (al Qaeda) that we allowed to enter the country after we removed Saddam and who are making the civil conflict worse?

Bush NEVER said we entered Iraq to get into the middle of a Civil war. If Bush had said that, Congress would NEVER have approved the invasion of Iraq. We removed Saddam and should have departed Iraq at the end of 2003! We can NOT win this Civil War and even with 160,000 troops have not been able to stop al Qaeda from operating in western Iraq.

Car Bombing in Baghdad Market Kills 25
By RAVI NESSMAN (Associated Press Writer)
From Associated Press
May 22, 2007 6:25 AM EDT
BAGHDAD - A parked car bomb ripped through a crowded outdoor market in southwestern Baghdad on Tuesday, killing 25 people despite a 3-month-old security crackdown meant to reduce violence in the capital.

At least 60 people were wounded in the 10 a.m. blast in the Shiite-dominated neighborhood of Amil. Nearby buildings were badly damaged and set ablaze, while others were reduced to rubble. Residents ran through the streets with buckets and pots of water, while others frantically tore through the rubble, looking for survivors. Groups of men carried bodies wrapped in tarps out of the damaged buildings.

you mean that you are so stupid that you don't know that the sudan isn't a threat to the usa

joe biden wants to go in and step genocide

saddam was also practicing genocide

joe biden is as outspoken against the removal of saddam as you are



and your right we can't end the violence only the iraqi people can do that.

and taking their weapons away wouldn't have stopped the violence either