drmiler

You are full of BS

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NjlkMGM2YjJjMDZmMzlhMDA0YzdiM2E3ODMwZjA0NWU=

      

Highly doubtful. Especially since "you're' the one who has refused debate on my Blog. So the one here full of BS is you. What the matter...no snappy comeback on why the democratic congress has a lower rating then the republicans? I can tell you why in 2 words, "THEY'RE LOSERS"! Just like you. You were the kind of officer that the enlisted men referred to as "ZERO'S"!

First, the GOP has been in charge for 6 years with control of the White House. The issues people do not like were NOT enacted by Democrats but by Republicans. So the things people do not like are not due to any failure of the Democrats. The fact is that because Bush has the veto power and the Democrats do not have a Veto proof Congress they are limited as to what they can change. If a Democrat is elected President in 2008, that will all change so long as the Democrats retain control of both houses of Congress.

Iraq, Immigration, Energy, Education, Budget, Trade, lack of health care, Social Security, Medicare etc. are ALL the issues the majority of Americans are not happy with. Guess WHAT they are all the policies of the GOP or a lack of any viable solution to issues (Social Security & Medicare)! Thus, people may not be happy with congress but the real problem is with the GOP policies.

the rebublicans had 6 years to fix these

the democrats had 40 years to fix these

so now who do we blame why the ones who have had the least amount of time of course

Why would you blame Repbulicans for problems that have been happening for years?  Answer.....because you are a one-sided democrat.

And stop speaking for what the "majority" wants, because you don't know what the majority wants.  They don't want high taxes or a nanny state like you constantly scream.

the majority of the people in this country just want to be left alone so they can go to work and go home and go out and have fun. they don't care about you, the democrats, the republicans, or the government.

that is why they are called the SILENT MAJORITY

"Why would you blame Republicans for problems that have been happening for years? Answer.....because you are a one-sided democrat." WRONG!!!!!


Some issues that need solutions like: enforcing our laws, finding solutions to paying for Social Security, Energy independence , Border protection, health care, Education have gotten worse. Medicare that was a problem was saddled with a new entitlement with no money to pay for it. Bush and the GOP controlled Congress took a balanced annual budget and turned it into a disaster. Invaded Iraq and now we are in a no win Civil War that has tied down much of our Army and Marines. If that is what you wanted from the GOP and Bush you have LOST YOUR MIND!

that so called balanced annual budget was only balanced once and that was the first year of clinton

and in order to do that he had to pass the highest tax hike in the history of this country

and listening to the senate yesterday the democrats want to repeat history



i never know that 150,000 was a majority of 1 million

danielost

"that so called balanced annual budget was only balanced once and that was the first year of Clinton."

No that was the LAST year of Clinton and Bush the very first year he was in office had a deficit. It took 19 Years after Reagan and his tax cuts and spending spree to balance the budget in 2000 and Bush blew that in his first year and ever year there after. He will turn over a budget in substantial deficit to the next president!


now we are in a no win Civil War that has tied down much of our Army and Marines.


“I never know that 150,000 was a majority of 1 million”

The Army is about 1/2 million and for every one deployed in combat you need two more -- one recovering from combat and one getting ready to deploy. Thus at 160,000 the vast majority of the Army and Marines are tied up with Iraq!

here is your so called balanced budget


Clinton's budget also proposes roughly $25 billion in "loophole closers" -- otherwise known as tax increases -- including eliminating tax breaks enjoyed by banks, real estate investment trusts and multinational corporations.

The new Clinton budget also envisions raising more than $65 billion over the next 10 years through a national tobacco settlement; that translates into roughly a $1.50-a-pack increase in cigarette taxes.

(i don't smoke but i don't think cigarettes went up 1.50 in 1999)

The whole budget is based on the tobacco settlement and ... I think it is fair to say when you talk to people on the (Capitol) Hill that the tobacco settlement is dead," Richard May, a former House Budget Committee staff director, told The Associated Press.

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/02/02/budget/index.html


Clinton's 2000 Budget is a Phony We shall tax and tax, and spend and spend, and elect and elect," said Harry Hopkins, President Franklin Roosevelt's closest adviser, in 1938. The same words could have been said by Bill Clinton today. His fiscal year 2000 budget is possibly the most political one ever put forward, transparently insincere, and filled with numbers that do not stand up to close scrutiny.

Clinton's budget is filled with so many initiatives that one cannot possibly take them seriously as genuine statements of administration priorities. Indeed, his main one -- reserving most of the budget surplus for Social Security -- is so poorly thought through that even budget experts cannot figure out how it is supposed to work.

In addition, one cannot take many of the budget projections at face value.

The idea that we can seriously count on a federal budget surplus of $393.1 billion in fiscal year 2009 simply cannot be believed -- we cannot even forecast current year surpluses accurately, let alone those a decade out.

Moreover, the revenue figures appear to be low-balled in order to forestall calls for tax cuts.

This budget assumes revenues will fall as a share of the gross domestic product in future years, but previous forecasts underestimated revenues (see figure).
There is no reason to believe the federal government will take a smaller share of GDP, absent the sort of major tax cut Clinton opposes.

Source: Bruce Bartlett, senior fellow, National Center for Policy Analysis, February 8, 1999.

For more on Balanced Budget Plan http://www.ncpa.org/pd/budget/budget-2.html

The Fiscal policy of the GOP is CHARGE and SPEND

The Fiscal policy of the Democrats is TAX and SPEND.

Of these two fiscal policies the Tax and Spend is far better then the Charge and Spend. The reason is very basic. Under Democrats we “pay as we go” which requires paying for our programs ONE TIME. The GOP spends as well (and at a higher level then Democrats) but because they refuse to “pay as you go” and change the added spending, we pay OVER and OVER and OVER. We are still paying for the increased spending Reagan started.

these two entitlements have their money put in the general fund along with all of the other taxes


ok gene your so much into taxes it is time for you to put your money where your mouth is and start giving all of your money to the government. let those idiots in washington tell you how to spend your money. that is exactly what the democrats want to do.


why becouse the older people in florida were too stupid to know who they were voting for.

and according to you america was to stupid to know who they were voting for in the last 6 years. becouse they didn't vote your way.

so from now on i will not consider you to be a democrat. you are a puppet dictator and a communist. and i do believe that sean is right there beside you becouse he keeps agreeing with you.

and not only are you a communist and a dictator but you are also a hypocret. becouse your not willing to give up YOUR MONEY for the good of the country