I go to a Baptist Church every Sunday
Do you think Baptists have a good idea of what the Bible teaches?
Did they have Bible studies that go into depth about what they teach? Do they take a look at the original Hebrew/Greek during their studies? The Bible
is a translation, you know.
Look, I think about this stuff every day.
Not very deeply, it appears. And it appears you've ignored my primary argument: People send
themselves to hell, God doesn't.
In addition, you're building up quite an emotional argument. You don't like it, therefore it's evil.
I read this book by a Mark Cahill
I don't know this person, and from the sounds of it, I don't like his theology anyways. I wouldn't say he's a good representative of our religion.
Free will? Man I hate free will!!!!!
All it means is you can make your own decisions. If you want to be somebody's slave and have somebody else make all of your decisions for you, then I guess Christianity is the wrong religion for you.
Why doesn't God just snuff Satin out of existence right now and tell us himself what to do so their is no room for doubt?????
If there's no doubt, then there's no choice. Besides - would you really believe him if he did such a thing? What about other people? How convincing would this really be?
Why are their multiple versions???
There are multiple
translations. The Greek and Hebrew are the same.
Why is their a Koran also???
There's nothing preventing people from writing their own books.
Is it possible that man crafted the bible in the over 2,000 years since its inception to create an utter abomination of the truth??
Sounds like your Baptist friends and the book author Mark Cahill have done such a thing.
I'm not Baptist, so I'm going to disagree with them on a lot of stuff. Same with Mark Cahill: Just because he claims to be a Christian and wrote something doesn't mean I'm going to agree with it.
If you say he does, then I say it makes complete sense for you to kill your child if he can't tie his shoes fast enough
Actually, if you want to be accurate, the child kills himself because he can't tie his shoes fast enough.
Here's an interesting quote from Glenn Miller's article:
http://www.christian-thinktank.com/gutripper.html
Eleventh, as a predictive model, this view of God's character fails rather significantly.
In other words, IF we construct a model of God's character as being sadistic and/or sycophantic, then our creaturely experience should reflect this. And, although there are aspects of our experience that might be understood to provide evidence for this (e.g., predation in nature? Natural evil?), the fact that our human lives are a mixture of pleasure and pain, with substantial amounts of pleasure counts quite heavily against this model.
Decades ago, a lawyer wrote:
'[If God were a sadist], He could give us infinitely more pain than we do suffer. He could force us to eat as the drug addict is forced to the use of his drug, by the pain of abstention instead of by the pleasing urge of healthy hunger. All physical functions could be forced by pain instead of invited by pleasure...If God were indifferent, why the variety of fruit flavors for the palate, the invariably harmonizing riot of colors in flower and sunset, the tang of salt air and power to vibrate in joy to these things?...If God loves His creatures all is explained, except death, pain, and sorrow, and these things would indeed present, as they do present to all but believers, an insoluble problem. But the Bible's explanation is clear as crystal: 'Death came by sin,' and the glorious end is as succinctly put as the explanation, 'And God shall wipe all tears from their eyes.'" [Irwin H. Linton, A Lawyer Examines the Bible, Wilde:1943, p.31., cited in Dave Hunt's In Defense of the Faith, Harvest House:1996, p.231]
A cruel or even mildly cruel God would simply be more likely to produce human violence as the majority cause of death (for example), instead of being a radical minority in our experience. Not only would the bodily appetites be driven by pain (as the lawyer conjectured above), but they could all be accompanied by pain in their exercise. No, the vast good and pleasures we people experience virtually everyday and virtually everywhere count strongly against any low-view models of God's character.
[It might be worth pointing out here we would not even 'bemoan' our free-will, if God were truly manipulative; there simply wouldn't be any...]
Glenn Miller's article is very long and multi-part. Here's another part that may be of interest:
http://www.christian-thinktank.com/gr5part2.html
Interestingly enough, you switch the image of hell from being a "fire and brimstone" image to a "doing the same thing over and over again for eternity" image - who is to say your new image is accurate? Who is to say you do the same thing over and over again in hell?
I think a better image of heaven/hell is one of a kingdom (a common illustration in the Bible): God creates a new kingdom, and invites everybody in. Inside the kingdom is much rejoicing and happiness, because the King is wise and just. Outside the kingdom, the King has no control. There is much crime and lawlessness outside, because the King is not there.
So, you are saying that the King should kill everybody outside just because they make themselves miserable? If that were to happen here on Earth, the King would be accused of genocide, and would indeed be accused of being evil! Seems like he can't win either way, eh?
You attend other services like go to a Hindu service, go to a Jewish service, spend time reading about near death experiences, and I read the bible front cover to back.
If you tell me which religion (or philosophy) you are, I'd be glad to study it so I have a good idea where you stand.
I've read a bit about near death experiences (I'll abbreviate it NDEs), actually. I found an interesting website where a person believes that dreams are actually a non-physical soul leaving the body, and it's connected to the body through some sort of "cord." The person also believes that there's only one place a soul goes to, and that in this place there's a center of goodness, and that all of the evil people are simply further away from this center, but can't go very near because it will destroy them. Earth is a place where they can improve themselves to get nearer to this center. This person claims to have studied many dreams and NDEs.
Is this similar to your own beliefs about NDEs? If not, then what do you believe?
Amen!!! The fault is our own, no one elses!
I agree!