(Citizen)little-whip January 24, 2007 10:49:06

There is nothing hypocritical about me deleting your responses. You knew you were blacklisted, and you were warned ahead of time. Jennifer offered me no such courtesy, she simply deleted away, labeled what she had deleted as a 'trolling' remark (leaving others to wonder what it was) and has never once informed me that I was on her blacklist or not welcome to comment on her threads.

What a crybaby you are. Wahhhh.

Wahhhh - pot and kettle come to mind

I think this is an excellent and well thought out article, I have to agree with your/the articles supposition that in order to be racist you have to be in favor of irrational bias, and that there is something more driving than religion such as genetics or just general "genetic" disposition. Linking IQ in a supposition and just how capable a predisposition to genetics a person is very interesting. In civilized society the environmental factors seem to have a larger effect on racism and ostrization then genetics. But you are right about peoples disposition to be introverted fear the unknown, and maintain xenophobia. How much of that is genetic and how much is environmental. How much is random? I would have to suppose that it is a combination of things. There is also a choice involved. That is and always has been available to people as we are sentient, without conclusive proof r study of how easy or difficult it is for people of varying degrees of intelligence to make that choice may be what we really need to measure.

I think society and individuals would prefer that anyone ought to be responsible for their own choices and the consequences of those choices.

What would be a good way to test this theory about the predisposition to racism or religion for that matter?

I was listening to a program that also though it was possible that humans were predisposed, genetically to believe in religion. Of course either of these is possible. The correlation would explain why religion is so prevalent as well as racism, when there are fairly compelling and logical reasons to believe in neither. Racism or Religion.

Reply to another forum post I've been BLsted

"Do explain to me how the above remark is 'crying' or 'complaining' about it in any way?"

You and another person in an online forum, Jenn, had a disagreement a few hours ago? days or weeks? WEEKS, Yet it drags onto today. That makes you a crybaby. Not just you, others, I didn't mention you by name directly in the sentence did I?

Don't thing like you are sooooo important to me LW, you ain't. I care more for rolls of tissue paper in my bathroom then I do for you. (Just being honest)

"There is nothing hypocritical about me deleting your responses."

I called it like I see it whip, you are a racist, and unfair, and weak, and unable to dish it out while also eating what you serve. This is truth and fact. Deleting my posts while posting on my blog just confirms the hypocrisy part.

"I guess Dan just missed me...enough so to open this thread and..."

I'm not weak like you and into censoring people, that would include... racists, stupids, people who aren't wise enough in their years to leave things unsaid, nor hypocrites.

I will never black list someone, as that is censorship, and it's Un-American, it's also unethical, you just don't get it LW, you are free to post whatever you want on your forum and mine, if you BL me, like I give a ratz azz btw, don't expect me to not call you on that i.e. a censor, and a hypocrite, i.e. further being weak, and a racist, as you are, on mine.

You hardly are an American in my eyes anymore, if you think censorships is fair or just. You also advocated the summary execution of men women and children, another example of fair and just treatment? Or were you just kidding about that?

Was I expecting anything more from you? No.

"'invite' me to comment."

LW, were you invited? no, not really. LOL. That's so rich. Free to post yes, and that is the difference between you and me. You are a racist, censor, hypocrite, and a weak individual. At the very least, I have the character to allow you speech and free exchange of ideas no matter how lame they be.

"I guess Dan just missed me...enough so to open this thread and 'invite' me to comment. Unless of course, he deletes these remarks, in which case I won't ever bother to do so again."

One of us has to act like an adult. You have 20 some years my senior on me, yet you act like the crybaby. Do as you please Whip, but realize today perhaps for the first time in a while who you really are, and maybe make a change for the better.

That's all I really have to say to you.

"do what they do Dan start your own thread on the subject...but hey you might be accused of flaming then aaarrghh!"

Well it is my blog lol.

Let them accuse, without any merit thats fine, it has always been. I just find it curious as to how many "Americans" are going along with this censorship, and not just Americans since the demographic here is vastly western, how many that live in modern western nations are viewing this "black list" or "delete" option as ethical or intelligent.

I guess if anybody at Stardock gave a shit about JU they would at least attempt to fix things, via a real MODERATOR PRESENCE!

I'm further curious in your infinite wisdom Whip, why you don't feel out of place on my blog, putting down your words, adding your 2 cents, after deleting my comments on yours, comments of which you do know damn well, were thought out, and written with the intent of offering contributing value... and not a "drive by dick heading" as you so eloquently put it.

I'm curious as to why you think it's acceptable to put your emotions ahead of better judgment regarding what people have to say. Why some opinions or comments have value in your eyes and others do not.

Moreover, I'm curious as to why when you delete these comments, censor them, rather then letting people decide for themselves, yet you still come here, no invitation, certainly I didn't blow you any kisses, still come here suggesting that I not delete your comments,

Through all of this, that doesn't make you a hypocrite?

I think it does.

And a stupid one at that.

Yet you still expect to be treated here that your opinions do matter? Enough to continue to post?

Do you know what is great about this place Whip, is I don't think you can control what I write on my keyboard.

"than an overwrought, undermedicated, blogging and tv addicted social reject with nothing better to do with my time than dwell on it. There are worse things to be in this world, although your twisted little liberal mind wouldn't understand that."

Woe is me...

My castle has been stormed by the queen bitchiness that is Whip.

Oh, you two bickering does provide me with quite a chuckle.

~Zoo

Note to BOTH of our happy JU couple: I've never seen ANYONE cream their jeans over another blogger like you two over LW. J, perhaps it is the reason for your spontaneous orgasms. There must be a deep lust behind your unhealthy obsession. If I were both of you, I'd seek professional help. Really. I would.

TRY PRACTICE WHAT YOU SCREAM ABOUT ALL THE TIME GIDEON - STOP TRYING TO MODERATE OTHER PEOPLES THREADS! YOU ARE TRYING TO MODERATE DAN HERE -STFU PRACTICE WHAT YOU PREACH WANKER

I have had just about enough of your self righteous bullshit - I am holier than thou bullshit - your I am better than you bullshit - Gideon - let me tell you here and now - you are a tosser an overgrown tosser that is full of himself and believes all his own bullshit!

OH and by the way ------

the above comments are NOT FLAMING ----they are responding RESPONDING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

DO keep in mind, dear, that this is in the forums, and as such, your language is most definitely against the ToU, and Admin will be directed here.

thats rich coming from someone who swears like a trooper all the time - go back onto my flame thread and read all the insults and swearing there from you.

Gideon is not avers to using the words BITCH either!

TWO SETS OF RULES AGAIN LW?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????


RESPONDING IS NOT FLAMING