"Was Spain, Portugal, Switzerland laid waste in World War II? And Japan was totally brought to its knees. It suffered far more than say France did. Japan is doing great. Why isn't France? Germany was devastated more than nearly any European country and it's come back better than most. I don't think World War II is a good rationale"
And with which countres does Spain, Portugal and Switzerland trade? You dont think WWII had any real contributing effect on the economic ability of European countries vrs the US and you call me ignorant? |
Yes. I say you're ignorant. I also noticed you ignored the inconvenient Japanese part of it. Who was Japan trading with? Why is Japan doing so much better than any country in Europe?
Um no. Apple invented the GUI. Microsoft dominates. You suggest a far tighter coupling between being first and being on top than is true of any field or discipline. There are a variety of factors that determine the leader of a particular field, or in this case economic power, than simply being first. I suggested what most reasonble people would agree as being a pretty good hiccup in the growth of Europe (A world war in its back yard!) but clearly this is irrelevant to you. A hiccup which not only severly reduced the economic competitiveness of the states involved but did simultaneously provide an economic sweetspot for the US...but of course to you this is entirely inconsequential. |
I made no implication that Europe has been inventing anything recently. You are switching your arguments midstream. You said that the US was based on European culture and values. Which I agree with (to a point). Therefore, why have they lost the lead?
Europe not only is not dominating in any major industry anymore, but they weren't even relevant in many of the major industries that have been created in the past half-century. The question is, why?
I would agree with you that two major world wars is a major hic-up. But the last one was 70 years ago. South Korea had a pretty major war in its backyard most recently. Would you like to do a GDP comparison of France and Italy compared to say South Korea per capita and look how it's doing? 50 years ago, South Korea was a land of peasant farmers with no industry. Now, they automobiles, computers, chips, and all kinds of other things that people use all the time. And it's not because it's "cheaper" (not the only reason).
In other words, World War II cannot be your crutch alone.
Your write off of Europe is far too simplistic and typical of the kind of whippersnapper state thinking that comes from countries so young. We've had people cross our borders for hundreds and hundreds of years. We're old enough and wise enough to know that they will be assimilated. We're confident in our ability to deal with change. We've done it for centuries. What you describe as old and tired is actually wisdom and self confidence a.k.a maturity. Something the US for all its contemporary might sorely lacks. |
Translation: I have nothing to back up my claims so I'll resort to arrogance and insults.
No wonder Europe is in decline. You're probably representative of the European mindset. No one is more critical of the United States than other Americans. We are always critiquing ourselves, pointing out our flaws. By contrast, there's little introspection in Europe from what I can see. Weaknesses are passed off as "wisdom and self-confidence". (they say this as they slowly die off in the most literal sense).
"By all measurements, coming back in 50 years won't be necessary because Europe won't be enough of a player to even bother a comparison any more than making a comparison between the US and South America today is not worth the time."
You know you chastise someone else on this thread about their ability to provide evidence of their claims; perhaps you can provide evidence of this claim of yours. Ive yet to hear or read anything that has any significant weight or merit that suggests "by all measurements" Europe will be economically irrelevant in 50 years. |
Your inability to read is hardly my fault. I provided several links (they're the underline thingies in this article) to back up what I am saying.
I'll even help you out:
Here's a really interesting article regarding European economic growth and comparing it to the United States:
http://www.timbro.com/euvsusa/pdf/EU_vs_USA_English.pdf
Definitely worth reading. |
I'll sum it up in easy to understand words:
a) Europe is already significantly far behind the United States in per capita GDP.
Europe is growing at a significantly slower pace than the United States in per capita GDP.
c) Europe's population is in decline and only immigration from largely Islamic countries is keeping the population decline from being really severe.
Therefore: Given time, Europe will be poor and Islamic compared to the rest of the world.
I also pointed out how uncommon things like microwave ovens and dryers and other basic household items are in European households. Given that the gap is growing, one can imagine the typical continental European living almost like a third-world person. I know when I've visited the continent how much it made me think I was going back in time because of the lack of conveniences.
While you're looking at that link, you might want to look at the plethora of other links provided in this thread and in the original article.
One of the primary reasons the US the invaded Iraq was to try and stave off a switch from the US petro-dollar to the Euro petro dollar. Europe. Irrelevant? Hardly. The US is quietly shitting itself about the future expansion of the EU. |
Wow. I mean...WOW. What a mind boggling statement. I've heard a lot of conspiracy theories as to why the US invaded Iraq but this is a new one.
Seriously, do you actually believe this or are you tossing this out as just troll bait? I mean, do you REALLY think that the US is worried about European "expansion"? Are you actually aware that the European economy is shrinking relative to that of the United States and other major economies? These aren't opinions, these are statistical facts that anyone who remotely follows this stuff is aware of.
The gap between Europe and the United States is widening but not in Europe's favor. If the nations of Europe were American states, they'd be amongst the poorest here.
"One might argue that anyone who takes pride in how little of the world's resources they use is a symptom of the problem"
One might argue that if they were a complete moron. Lets see I've got a tenner in my pocket. It's got to last me all my life. My strategy therefore, cause im so clever, is too spend it all at once and worry about the future when it comes. Hey i know. Maybe if i close my eyes real tight and deny the future, it wont come at all. Yep, thats my brilliant strategy. Think it'll work...... ? |
WOW. This is really a great discusion because it really does highlight the different mindsets. DO you realize what you've just said? You look at the world's resources as truly finite as in very very limited. WOW.
Looking back to the start of the 20th century... We didn't have automobiles, we didn't have airplanes, we didn't have computers, TVs, movies, phones, nuclear power, blood transfusions, antibiotics, and countless other things. Heck, we didn't even have the "fossil fuel" industry which you seem so convinced we're going to run out of.
And you're trying to argue what resources we'll be dealing with in another 50 years? Heck, odds are we'll have fusion power or god knows what.
But if you truly believe what you wrote above, I think we have our answer as to why Europe is becoming irrelevant and apathetic as their culture and people are being overrung by immigrants who see them as worthless infidels.
What you have just written describes the attitude of the depressed retiree. They have a fixed income and they are conserving all their resources in order to stave off death. But in their hearts, they know death is coming.
In the United States, our culture is that we have a "tenner in our pocket" and we'll use that $10 to make $20 and then $40 and then $80.
And that, my friend, is the key difference between us.