I think it would be best if you learned reading comprehension.

Thats funny. I figured the only way anyone would be able to comprehend what you've written is to become stupidier not smarter.

If you see what I wrote as bad or a slam against a nation then you misread it.

Or otherwise just very poorly written.

You are good at telling lies I grant you that.

Lies.... like the ones about WMD you mean?

Hence Iraq who had been giving aid to the terrorist to the point that terrorist injured in Afghanistan were in hospital in Iraq.

Is that why the US invaded? Gee the actual reason has changed so many times now that I cant keep up. A terrorist in hospital bed so you invade Iraq? How about a terrorist in a flight school? Should we all invade you?

How about a future terrorist in a CIA funded terror school? Can you categorically state that you dont have a terrorist in hospital bed in the states right now? No of course not. No government has that level of introspection. But somehow or should i say "conveniently" you expect the Iraqi government should?

Besides knowing you guys, your "intelligence" on the matter was probably completely wrong anyhow. How many times are you going to attempt to rewrite your lousy pretext for war?

If you wish to be counted with them then we as a nation will be coming after you as well.

  You cant even handle that which is currently on your plate sunshine so dont bother making idle threats. Although you could add that to your list of why the world dispises you.i.e "threatening overtures" and "openly hostile to any form of dissent", despite your shallow attempts of trying to pass yourselves off as the "defenders of freedom".

Any other nation that is seen as aiding the terrorist that attacked us will be in for the same fate.

   Well then you'd better start attacking yourselves (and more than just the odd conspiracist thinks you already did) because as everyone knows it was the US that created and funded Osama.

Oil rich Iraq? My friend you are sorely misguided. There is more oil in reserve off the coast of one of our states called Florida then there is in all of Iraq.

Misguided? Clearly you are as ill informed as you seem. You definitely do struggle with the mathematical concept of quantities dont you? Your own CIA tells us that Iraq has 5 times as much oil reserves as the US. The US is also the worlds leading consumer of oil.

WWW Link">Link

As for motive well:

"Global oil consumption is close to 80 million barrels per day, and is also very unevenly distributed. The USA consumes over a quarter of this, whilst producing only 9.2%, making it (on a per capita basis) the most heavily-consuming and import-dependent country in the world. "

[link="http://planb.org/resources/beyondoil/10_reserves.php"]WWW Link">Link

"In any case, major oil importers aren't waiting around to find out who's right. The US, Japan, Europe, and China, are scrambling to tie down petroleum resources in the Caspian Sea region, Russia, West Africa, Iraq, Iran, and Libya."

"Many experts suspect that oil was one reason, among others, the US invaded Iraq. America's longstanding concern with its oil supplies is nothing new. Newly declassified British documents suggest that President Nixon was prepared as a "last resort" to launch airborne troops to seize oil fields in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Abu Dhabi to end the 1973-74 oil embargo on the US by the Arab nations."

[link="http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/0129/p14s01-wogi.html"]WWW Link

I wont suggest your deliberately "telling lies" about such facts. As it's clear you're more ignorant than cunning.

Lies.... like the ones about WMD you mean?

I see you ignored what I wrote about the stockpile of WMD found. So far they have discovered three different stockpiles. Proof that Iraq had WMD's has been there for years. It was in the surrender document signed by Iraq at the end of the Gulf war. The listed what stockpiles and types of WMD they had. Unless you are saying they lied to us and really did not have them. The UN went in to destroy them and were kicked out before the job was finished. Less than half of the admitted stockpiles are accounted for.

So I ask you where is the lie? Your hard hearted beleife that Mr. Bush lied to get into a war has one less valid claim.

I wont suggest your deliberately "telling lies" about such facts. As it's clear you're more ignorant than cunning.

You are delusional if you think you have proven anything. The articles you site have one consistant theme. The words "suspect" and "suggest" are speculative, not difinitive. In short you are taking the word of un-named sources that won't go farther out on a limb than to say they suspect that America went to war for oil even when there is proof otherwise.

It has been the policy of the United States to import oil as long as it is cheaper because it means our reserves will stay intact longer. Now here is something you can chew on. There is no shortage of oil. Oil is naturally produced and is not a fosil fuel as once believed. But since you are not interested in learning the truth about the war why should I expect you to bother to learn about oil.

You cant even handle that which is currently on your plate sunshine so dont bother making idle threats. Although you could add that to your list of why the world dispises you.i.e "threatening overtures" and "openly hostile to any form of dissent", despite your shallow attempts of trying to pass yourselves off as the "defenders of freedom".

This is where that comprehension thing comes in so handy. It was not a threat it was a warning to those that choose to side with terrorist.

I find it strange that your nation fought in WWII even though your nation was not directly attacked. I think you missed that little thing on September 11 2001 or the broadcasts of the terrorist saying that it is their intention to kill or convert the entire world to Islam. Either you don't believe they will carry out that threat or you don't believe you are part of the world. I don't believe they will succeed but with you in their fan club it may take longer to beat them.

(Citizen)Paladin77November 18, 2006 21:39:25

Are you an American? Your views seem pretty well biased. yup, born in the Bronx. Former registered Democrat. can't get any more American than that.

1416 Walton ave.

Former member of the DEMONCRAP party.,
]

American and damn proud of being a citizen of the greatest country on the planet.

Most countries hate us because we have it all, freedom at the top of the list our poor people here live better than the middle class of other countries live,

Poor here in Americas means you are a one car family, only 2 or 3 televisions, the refrigerator is only half full, you have an air conditioner in the window instead of central air, you have to use the laundromat instead of in home washer and dryer.

I could go on and on but I am sure this is enough to get some of our resident commies will get their panties all in a bunch.

Live there until the collored people started moving in and we went to Westchester.

I thought you said you were black? Why would the arrival of other blacks make you want to move?

If you wish to be counted with them then we as a nation will be coming after you as well. You cant even handle that which is currently on your plate sunshine so dont bother making idle threats.

Hey yo-yo.....the US doesn't make "idle" threats. At least Bush doesn't.

Well thankfully i dont live in your country

Well thank God for small favors!

In all seriousness, cacto, many working class blacks WILL leave a neighborhood when it gets too 'dark' because with that increasing depth of color comes increasing crime rates, increased drug activity, and a host of other social problems that are overrepresented within that racial group.

Or Italians, and Irish they pray funny and lie alot. lol Just for the record I moved into a 90% black town call Mt. Vernon. Malcome X family moved into a huge house down the street from us. Funny no crime there until the Irish started moving in. Though white is a shade just like black I think of them as colored because of my liberal upbringing.

Are you so racist to believe that colored means black?

Apparently yes. I've only seen the term used in Apartheid-era South African and Imperial British literature. What races are covered by 'coloured' to you? I would never have guessed the Irish and the Italians would fit in that description.

Where did you hear it first used in that context, if you don't mind me asking? The origins of words are always interesting, and I've never come across any reports of black communities that consider whites 'coloured', so your example is particularly interesting.

Where did you hear it first used in that context, if you don't mind me asking? The origins of words are always interesting, and I've never come across any reports of black communities that consider whites 'coloured', so your example is particularly interesting.

Redd Foxx was the first to use this context in his show Sanford and son. A white cop was asking him about the people that robbed him. the cop asked if they were colored and Sanford said yeah, white.