Are you advocating a violent revolution? Who are you going to replace the politicians with?

Though I understand your point, I, in a way, have to agree with him. I believe what he is saying is we should get new people, people who will better serve their people. We should not hold on to those who do stupid things. We should remove those who do not work for the people. Some of us believe that countries like Iraq and Iran only understand death and destruction. The truth is that, in a difference sense, so do Americans. No one stands up to crime now a day till one of their own gets hurt or dies. No one cares about what happens in the streets till something happens to them. revolution may be a bit over kill, but something must be done. And that something is for us average Americans to wake up, get up, vote for the right people (whether it be dems or reps) then after we chose, we stay on top of them and make sure they do what is best and beneficial for us not themselves.

We need change more than Iraq does. And I don't necesasarily mean Bush. I mean politicians in general. We the people need to show these politicians that they are there for us, not themselves.

Reply #3 Term limits on Congress perhaps?

I've always felt we needed term limits. But naturally those people will never enact such a limit upon their own jobs.

Term limits on Congress perhaps?

I've always felt we needed term limits. But naturally those people will never enact such a limit upon their own jobs.

That would be like bitting that hand that feeds them, themselves. That's not a bad idea though.