Being anti-Bush should not be considered anti-U.S., otherwise that would be frightneningly similar to a dictatorship. This country gives us the freedom to speak our minds if we feel that we do not agree with the policies of our current president. We should all strive to to be anti-war isn't that what we are all trying to accomplish?

From what I understand, war against a country without oil is perfectly fine, but war against a country with war is evil!I love that animation, Anthony!

Truer words have never been spoken..or written....Who'd have thought using logic to tackle a debate issue could win points....I award you 10 points for being realistic and sane....(must not be a member of the anti-war crowd as they rarely are)..lol

I am rabidly anti-war, and anti-Bush. I am not a communist. I despise dicatatorships. In the end, remember, it is people like myself who provide you with the freedom to spout party-line nonsense.

On a related note, Gorby, Che Guevarra, etc., were not responsible for the deaths of 100 million people, or whatever stat you chose to quote. The primary cause of the deaths in the Soviet world was the dictatorship of Stalin. In plain terms, this was not a socialist regime, but a communist regime. In truth, it was even rogue in that category. There has never been a viable, and fundamentally true, communist nor socialist regime. To pretend there has been is ridiculous.

Remember, the greatness of man is to aspire to the greatness of man. That is why Guevarra, Lenin, etc., remain on t-shirts. (These men were not, truly, dictators.) The reason Mao, Stalin, Kim Jung Il, etc., are on t-shirts is to draw a parallel between themselves and your president. It is not to glorify the deaths of millions. If you choose to call the rabid left a bunch of peace-niks, that's one thing; if you choose to describe them as totalitarian, or in favor of massive, ethnically based death, then you are sadly confused. I'd check your facts before you make generalizations.

D

Remember, the greatness of man is to aspire to the greatness of man. That is why Guevarra, Lenin, etc., remain on t-shirts. (These men were not, truly, dictators.) The reason Mao, Stalin, Kim Jung Il, etc., are on t-shirts is to draw a parallel between themselves and your president. It is not to glorify the deaths of millions. If you choose to call the rabid left a bunch of peace-niks, that's one thing; if you choose to describe them as totalitarian, or in favor of massive, ethnically based death, then you are sadly confused. I'd check your facts before you make generalizations.

So, to describe a group of people to think that it was wrong to oust a dictator who killed millions of people as totalitarian, is to be confused, but to compare George W. Bush to Mao, Stalin, and Kim Jung Il, isn't? This is why nobody takes the left seriously. It's one thing not to like Bush and think he's a terrible president, but I don't see him killing millions of innocent people and I really doubt that he has absolute power over the nation (and if he does, then why are Democrats going to bother to vote since he's a dictator).

The methods the president used to establish panic ie: wmd, terror collarborations were proved false. Had he the nerve to just be frank with his voters and say, this man has committed human rights violations for years, let's stop this - I think this war would have been supported differently. In the simplest of terms, direct confrontation was not needed to remove Saddam from leadership. To be goaded into action because of this smacks of british arrogance 100 years prior.

It is one thing to be lied to. It is quite another to be have open admission of intellegence failures and be told, "so what?" That is where the problem is.