If you can't get support for your plans, or worse yet, if you are getting hammered by the other side, just change the name of the plan, change the wording just a little, or in a stroke of Clinton-esqe genius just change or challenge the meanings of some of the wording you are you using and claim that what you are proposing isn't what it is at all.
That seems to be the latest "plan" by the Democrats. Those same Democrats that have hammered President Bush over not having a plan, not setting a date certain, not drawing down troops, not handing off to the Iraqis and just leaving that country.
News cycles today (via Washington Post radio as an example) note that a few Senators, including Carl Levin, are proposing new plans that would get us out of Iraq and force the President to to let them stand on their own. They claim we need to take away the security blanket so that the Iraqis quit relying on us and stand for themselves. Nice claims. Sounds reasonable. They even continue on to say their plan isn't "cut and run" and that we wouldn't be "abandoning the Iraqis and surrendering to the terrorists."
Well I say if it smells like a duck, walks like a duck, etc....
Nice try Democrats (and other liberals that want us to abandon the effort and accept a partial victory, which is also in fact a partial defeat). Hopefully the other side will continue to nail you for supporting what is, in fact, a CUT AND RUN plan.
